all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

300 billion in savings now (citation needed), trillions in destruction later. great investment!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yay lets bring back smog like its the 1970’s. #sarcasm just in case.

    This is what America looked like before the EPA cleaned it up

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    I wanted to read this with an open mind, thinking that maybe this incentivizes nuclear, but no:

    For over 15 years, the Obama and Biden administrations implemented a war on coal to destroy reliable and affordable energy.

    Oof. Back to the industrial age, boys and girls.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    America is just a developing country we can't expect them to meet climate targets.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    What an odd way to spin choking on smog.

  • source
  • More like environmental perdition administration

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/tech@piefed.world view that post
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    something is wrong that the president has thia much power. so many of us learned how much past presidents just didnt do out of respect for the office.

  • source