They met at a bar in midtown Manhattan. He arrived wearing a baseball cap pulled low and sported a pair of black-framed glasses, she says. As conversation flowed, from discussions about navigating life in New York to past relationships, he mentioned that his glasses were Meta Ray-Bans.

“I wasn’t familiar with them,” McAnuff, a 28-year-old project manager who now lives in Toronto, tells WIRED. It was her first time seeing the smart glasses up close, which can record images and video from the wearer’s viewpoint. He let her try them on and even showed her a couple of videos that he’d taken previously, she says. “That was it. We stopped talking about it after that. I figured that was the end of the use.”

The next day, checking her Instagram, McAnuff noticed she’d been tagged in one of his story posts. To her surprise, it was footage of them at the bar and on the subway together, en route to a basketball game uptown. In the video, McAnuff is captured from an above angle, sitting across from her date who is holding a drinking glass; WIRED has seen screenshots of the footage. “I felt super violated,” McAnuff says. “Like, what if I don’t want everyone knowing what I’m up to? He felt so free to film me and post it. There was no conversation about it.”

Meta sold more than 7 million pairs of the Ray-Bans in 2025, as its smart glasses have infiltrated public spaces thanks to pranksters with dreams of viral fame, some of whom even film people while they’re at work. The phenomenon, which has also spread to pickup artists hitting on women, has earned the hardware the nickname “creep glasses.”

Among singles, and particularly women, Meta’s AI-powered eyewear has become a recurring nuisance, as people share a spreading unease about being covertly filmed on dates.

top 68 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 1 month ago (1 child)

I thought the convention was to call them "perv glasses"?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 125 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Men Wearing Meta Glasses on Dates Is an Instant Red Flag

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I've read this story about it where the people who bought them stopped wearing them within a few weeks because they felt uncomfortable wearing them - common theme was, when people notice you were those glasses they shun you and find an excuse to end the conversation. Guess people in general agree with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Where is the "hue hue people have cameras in their phone and you have no problem with that, checkmate" guy...I know you're in here.

    The Instagram part of the story perfectly highlights the difference. Busting out a camera to start filming the entire date so I can make a highlight reel later is way more conspicuous than simply wearing my glasses. One leads to a discussion while the other is inconspicuous and likely never had consent in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This is the only sane take on perv glasses.

    If someone pulled out their phone to photograph me on our first date, I'd nip that in the bud, and maybe just walk away. I guess I might be okay if there was a scenic background and they said "want to get a selfie together?" but a photo just of me across the table? Creepy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    And with a conversation about it all that can be laid out and consented to.

    Hey this view is really pretty can we take a selfie? Sure!

    Later that evening: Hey that photo came out good, do you mind if I post it to my Instagram? I'd prefer if you didn't.

    Okay no problem.

    It doesn't need to be any more complicated than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    7 million? People actually bought this?

    Jeez there's a lot of perverts in the world

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    When Google Glass came out, I was excited because of the notion of augmented reality. I wanted to be a gargoyle like Hiro Protagonist became in Snow Crash.

    But then, yeah, the pervs and jerks came out and ruined the fun for everyone. We all learned glasses that humans — Americans, at least, — weren't mature enough

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago

    Anyone wearing these anywhere is a huge red flag.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Pervert glasses.

    They’re called pervert glasses.

    Get it right, Wired.

    And let’s also lay it all out: the only people wearing them are sick enough in the head to need immediate institutionalization. Full stop, end of story.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I still like the original Glass Hole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Velma Idk what it is about your post but they seem to make the misogynists crawl out of the network. Always multiple people telling on themselves in the comments. Not every post with "Men" in the title needs someone saying "b-but women!"

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm old enough to remember when Google came out with their version. People went appoleptic and cried invasion of privacy. What happened, why were these not shunned in the same way? It's our because they just look like sun glasses? The only acceptable use for these is to aide blind people

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    Oh, how fun. Now we'll all be even more repressed because literally every interaction will be recorded and you better not do anything cringe.

  • source
  • [–] 64 points 1 month ago (29 children)

    *people wearing creep glasses is a red flag

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (27 children)

    I haven't seen a story yet about women wearing these glasses for nefarious purposes. Do you have any to share?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (26 children)

    Given that you're operating on anecdotal evidence, the onus would be on you to prove that the effect is exclusively gender linked.

    I quite frankly wouldn't be surprised if men are more of a problem with them than women or non binary folk, but as-is the headline is needlessly and intentionally divisive,and does not support that conclusion. Hell, I would argue that the majority of what most people post on social media is creepy, men and women included. It's weird to share non consensual images of people publicly, regardless of how insta rotted your brain is.

    We should all always be trying to use people first language unless there's a really specific reason not to, and in this case the point is that people being creepy wear creep glasses, there's no reason to bring gender into it, the reader can draw their own conclusions based on what they know about creepy people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] [S] 21 points 1 month ago (25 children)

    I linked an article that has a focus on men using these glasses on dates. I didn't come up with the article title myself.

    Do you have any stories of women abusing these glasses?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (24 children)

    I can think of countless cases of women sharing stuff on social media that they shouldn't.

    The point is that creeps wear creep glasses.

    Just because the author is being needlessly divisive for clicks doesn't mean you need to continue that chain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] [S] 21 points 1 month ago (22 children)

    Do you have stories of women or non-binary people abusing these glasses?

    I'm sincerely asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think remember reading one about a South Korean lady wearing them on dates and feeding the footage into Claude to analyze and improve her dating skills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago

    That's interesting! The article goes into some men using the glasses for the same thing:

    Gary Lewandowski, a psychology professor at Monmouth University whose research focuses on the science of romantic connection, says adding covert cameras to the mix will only make building trust harder. He says beyond posting for the ’gram, a number of factors could be driving men to do this. The most logical, non-creepy reason may be tied to post-date analysis, in that the glasses can help men identify blind spots around their own behavior.

    “A lot of men out there are eternal optimizers. They want better, more efficient ways of doing things, so reviewing game tape allows them to learn from mistakes,” Lewandowski says. “But I do wonder if some are doing it to build a case instead of a connection—why they’re right and the other person is wrong—or to help better identify red flags.” That type of surveillance “makes the date less about getting to know each other and more about fact gathering,” he adds.

    I can see the benefits of that approach as long as the person being recorded is aware of what they're being used for.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (19 children)

    I have no stories of anyone abusing these glasses other than the small handful of anecdotes in the article that can fit on one hand.

    And as the article points out, 7M of these glasses were sold, so 2-3 stories is not exactly statistically significant or relevant.

    I can find you numerous stories of female stalkers and creeps using cellphones though, if that is would help.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    This is far from the first article I've seen covering these glasses. Many of them are posted to this community.

    I'd honestly be interested to see if women and non-binary people are similarly abusing privacy issues with these glasses and in what circumstances. I haven't seen it reported.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

    Also, the article headline is that 'men wearing smart glasses on dates is a red flag'...

    Regardless of the stats of who is being creepy currently, the headline is still wrong and needlessly gendered as anyone who wears them on a date is a red flag.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Talking about men who wear smart glasses on dates doesn't mean that everyone else who wears smart glasses is innocent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    :/

    Come on now. My point is that the headline is needlessly divisive.

    Do you really think that distinction changes that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (9 children)

    Do you have stories of women and non-binary people abusing smart glasses?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    You seem real pleasant to be around, the real type of person that draws people to their cause and doesn't just alienate everyone!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Are you a politician or something? Dodging the question like kung fu

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I haven't dodged, I've already said I didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    So then the rest of us can continue to discuss the specific scenario of the type of men who wear these glasses on dates. Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    This article is focusing on the type of men who wear smart glasses on dates. Focusing on one aspect of an issue doesn't mean no others exist.

    The article even goes into detail about why men in particular might be more tempted to abuse smart glasses. Did you read the article?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago

    This article is focused on the type of men who wear smart glasses on dates. Does this article talk about another subject I didn't read about in the body of the article?

    Yes, people who wear smart glasses and record without consent are bad. This particular article is looking at the type of men who do so on dates.

    Are you regularly confused about subjects of articles?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I can find you numerous stories of female stalkers and creeps using cellphones though, if that is would help.

    No, the topic is the smart glasses and their use to intrude on other's privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    So new smart technology with cameras come out, people across the gender spectrum use them to be creeps (smartphones).

    Now new smart technology with cameras come out (smart glasses), and you think the more valid evidence to look at is a handful of anecdotal stories, rather than applying similar statistics from the previous technology?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You're conflating me with the author of the article.

    "Men that wear smart glasses" is not the same as "Men" to be clear. People who wear smart glasses with the intention of recording others without their consent is the topic here.

    I haven't seen any articles or stories about women or non-binary people abusing smart glasses and I'm curious to read more if there are stories out there on that topic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Are you implying that no women or non-binary people have at any point abused smart glasses? That'd be a statistically impossibilty considering at least 7 million creep glasses have been sold.

    If not, and you agree that there has at some point been women or non-binary people abusing the glasses, simply through sheer statistics, then the headline is needlessly gendered.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 month ago

    Are you implying that no women or non-binary people have at any point abused smart glasses? That’d be a statistically impossibilty considering at least 7 million creep glasses have been sold.

    Of course not. I'm asking if there are articles covering the topic of women and non-binary people abusing smart glasses. I'd like to see the circumstances and if there are any differences. I'm honestly curious.

    This article is focused on the men who wear smart glasses on dates. That doesn't mean no one else is abusing these glasses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    My Meta Glasses memeable thought of the day:

    If you feel violated when a private citizen follows you around with a camera, might want to also feel violated when the state follows you around with millions of cameras.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago
    [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I wonder what's gonna happen when someone who has like a reactionary-style mental illness, yet is cognitively aware enough to know what the glasses are and keeps up with current events, sees someone with the glasses on and just punches the person in the face. 🤣.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I am just thinking that people will definitely make porns with those glasses

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yup, run the feeds through GenAI and bam, a fascsimile in compromising positions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Interesting......

    I was actually thinking in a more traditional way, you know.....just doing it while wearing the glass and record it.

    But yeah....your way seems work better. Sigh, my mind is start lagging behind the AI world I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    These people would actually have to be able to get laid for the first plan to work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I know. lol

    Technology really evolved...... Some people of my age are laughing on their parents that they don't know computers stuff.

    When my daughter grown up, I think she will laughing at me about I don't know shit about AI or whatever that will come out at her era lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    What a world we live in. Just stick your phone in his face and video him too?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    49 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post