My question = Has Trump ever told Putin to stop striking civilian infrastructure in Ukraine?
post
If Trump tells you to stop doing something, then you’re doing something right.
Trump might actually be onto something with this one. If only there was someone who started a conflict this year that has disrupted crude supply whom it could have been given too earlier.
But Trump said America doesn't need anyone else's oil, and the they harvest and produce more than anyone else, so they won't be affected by any of this.
Does this mean he lied to me?
He’ll just update the map and call it America, there don’t need anyone. America doesn’t need anyone!
Ukraine was forced to attack Russian refineries by Trump's war on Iran. That war sent fuel prices skyrocketing, and thereby also Russia's oil revenue, which Putin uses to fund the war. In order to hinder Russia's ability to wage war, Ukraine had no option but to start blowing up Russian refineries. At least that way Russia doesn't profit from Trump's inflated oil prices.
And with Russian strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, it's impossible to argue it's not a legitimate target. If Trump doesn't like it, he has to provide an alternative. Complaining about the consequences of his actions isn't going to fix anything.
Ukraine President Zelenskyy calls on President donald trump to halt strikes on Iranian diesel, saying the attacks are causing a fuel shortage
I want to Zelenskyy to destroy all of Russia’s oil refineries and oil production facilities and oil infrastructure even harder
Zelensky listened to the US early on and left the petro alone. Big mistake as it may have ended the war by now if Russia didn’t have the petro dollars.
Zelenskyy should also bomb some Russian troll farms and futher damage MAGA's midterm chances.
Far as I can tell theres no incentive for them to abide by this. Keep pushing, Ukraine - this strategy is working.
JFC, priorities, I guess.
Tiny d donnie might want to tell Putin to stop killing people in Ukraine and put an end to this war?
Does the US even provide anything to Ukraine anymore? Because I thought that at this point Ukraine is just fighting with weapons/gear they get from European countries and stuff they built for themselves. What leverage does he have on Ukraine? Can he stop providing them ammo? Lol no, the US apparently doesn't have enough for themselves. There's also the simple fact that European countries can just get stuff from the US and pass it on to Ukraine, and they're being more and more willingly to do it since Russia is starting to attack them.
Trump and everyone around him are such morons it's painful. If they wanted to have leverage over Ukraine they should have kept supplying them so they could hold those supplies over their heads in cases like these. Now it's just words nobody cares about.
What is he gonna do otherwise? Invade Ukraine? Support Russia militarily?
Man this kind of incompetence would be quite funny if there weren't so many people dying.
Sadly at least AFAIK weapons, Starlink (paid by Europe) and intel.
For a nation that prides itself on its somewhat dubious war fighting capabilities, they sure managed to pick an absolute dunce at warfare to be their commander in chief.
Generally speaking, it's usually not wise to do what a rapist tells you to do. It doesn't stop their rapist tendencies.
Trump's religion is the worship of Trump.
He's been singlularly ineffective at gaining wealth except by theft, and he is too stupid to wield power effectively.
"SORRY WAT?? [blast]
VE KAN'T HEAR YOUR LEETLE WHYNINGK [explosion]
OVER TEH SOUND OF ALL TZESE ROOZZIAN
[booms intensify]
DIESSEL REFINERIEES
(shockwave whoosh) EXPLHODDING. Hang on...
(Background) "MOAR FIRE, SERGEI, HEET EM AGGEN!"
(Cheering in background: "Slava Ukrani!!")
ANYWAY. BISSY BISSY. CALLK BACK LATUR."
[Skype_hangup.wav]

top 41 comments