War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Privacy is surveillance

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 71 points 1 month ago (2 children)

George Orwell only made two mistakes:

  • He was off by 42 years
  • The surveillance is conducted by the private sector in cahoots with the fascist state for profit rather than directly by the state.
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    The surveillance is conducted by the private sector in cahoots with the fascist state for profit rather than directly by the state.

    it had always been this way and orwell would have known that if he didn't buy into the propaganda.

    i'll be forever funny that COINTELPRO was active during orwell's time so there's a strong possibility that it elevated his work because of its pro-propaganda messaging.

  • source
  • parent
  • The surveillance is conducted by the private sector in cahoots with the fascist state for profit rather than directly by the state.

    Yeah, I don't think that's a particularly meaningful distinction. It's actually a viable definition of fascism itself.

    “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.” — Benito Mussolini

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Wtf, it’s called a watch, not a listen

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I've read (and don't quote me on it) that the way it gets around those laws is it's technically not "recording". It's real-time dictation with no audio recorded or transmitted anywhere...

    ... But even so, it really goes against the spirit of those laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You know gamers, I really love how this era of capitalism we're living in is just companies trying to spy on us as hard as possible to know what exactly to advertise to us and if you show any form of rejection to it, then you get called a schizo by your friends.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Yeah but its OK when its Apple and not Zuckerberg who are doing it. I have no idea why Apple keeps getting away with everything they do. They could release Metas creepy smartglasses tomorrow in an aluminium finish and people would love them and excuse any privacy concerns.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    that's how you know it's a cult

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The audio warning chime would also not help ppl who are deaf.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Pervert watches to complement the pervert glasses.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 month ago* (7 children)

    Not quite:

    The Facebook pervert glasses are purchased by perverts to shoot videos of their victims, and Facebook rides along to perform their privacy invasion.

    Apple's watch performs the same insane level of privacy invasion but all you get in return is a lousy text summary of what was said. Nothing to jack off on or blackmail someone with like with the Facebook spectacles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    Nothing to jack off on

    Oh you sweet summer child 😂

    I was thinking things like skimming credit card numbers or some creep hearing you give you phone number to the clerk and stalking you.

    Video is different, but the ability to record 24/7 has all kinds of criminal possibilities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago

    I was thinking things like skimming credit card numbers

    You were specifically talking about pervert uses. That's not perverted.

    or some creep hearing you give you phone number to the clerk and stalking you.

    That is perverted though. Touche.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    What’s stopping the creep from doing this with any other available audio recording device right now? You don’t need an Apple Watch to do any of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    You could make the same argument about the glasses, I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    I think the glasses are different because they are not as easily spotted as other video recording devices. Especially when someone disables the recording indicator (that is not very visible in the first place). They can be mistaken for normales glasses more easily.

    An audio recording device can record without being seen by the other party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    I think the glasses are different because they are not as easily spotted as other video recording devices.

    That's not true at all, we've had cheap tiny hidden bodyworn recording devices for a long time.

    Instead of glasses how about a cross: https://blackpointsecurity.com/products/black-cross-necklace-hidden-spy-camera-with-dvr.html

    Or maybe in a pen in your pocket: https://blackpointsecurity.com/products/mini-spy-full-hd-pen-recorder-camera.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Nononono apple cares about my privacy! They're so different from Google!! /s

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    The wearer's Watch emits an audible tone, even in silent mode, to alert those in the vicinity and provides a visual cue for those able to see the face of the device.

    Nonetheless, bystanders alerted to the recording – to the extent they recognize the meaning of the tone – have not consented to being recorded, which is a legal requirement in 11 US states that have all-party consent laws.

    Ok, so it actively alerts about the recording, unlike "Voice Memos" or any other audio recorder app. And so its on the onus of the user to ensure those in the conversation consent, which is and has always been the case for any sort of recording device. Apple bad, updoots to the right pls

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Great, first we had to be on the lookout for assholes wearing Rayban glasses, now we have to be wary of anyone wearing an Apple Watch...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    I have an old Apple Watch and this made me wanna get rid of it.

    I've bought into their ecosystem (mainly just because I hate every other tech giant slightly more) but they've really done little to impress me these past few years...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    So can a phone, or a tiny audio recorder.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    They've been actually listening to conversations for years, what is new is that an LLM is going to report about it to the user... which is quite ironic if you ask me.

    Imagine breaking up with the one you love only to have your watch remind you about it later... pathetic

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Assumably it’s a “passive” feature that you have to explicitly tell “hey keep record of that” within 15 seconds of the interaction.

    So a little less doom and gloom than the headline suggests.

    Edit: It seems I mixed up features. This still doesnt sound terrible. You as a user turn it on, the device emits a tone and visual cue. You can do the same thing with any number of sound recording devices out there, and they give literally zero warning they are recording.

  • source
  • parent