As someone not entirely against AI: No fucking shit. AI is terrible at reasoning and judgement.
post
Prior Authorization is a problem, not just AI. It’s supposed to be a solution for when doctors do things like order MRIs for every patient at imaging centers they own or get kickbacks from.
But we have a method to deal with that already and it’s called arrest and trial. Why is the solution make sick people wait for paperwork? The majority of these services are appropriate.
Fuck prior authorization and fuck letting insurance companies deny claims at all! We paid for our god damned insurance, being allowed to use it should be a right, not a vaunted privilege that can be fraudulently ripped away while we die with no recourse after a lifetime of paying exorbitant rates!
Even when people "win" their appeals, the delay in care can be enough to kill them. Shit, the stress alone is insane.
Testing in prod, where prod may be life and death medical decisions, seems... unwise.
I don't know about hating AI for this. Prior authorization is pretty straight-forward and rules-based. It's actually not a bad use case in theory. In practice, it's probably more like, "oh, great, we can deny all these claims and dodge accountability by blaming AI, while we pay Trump's buddies for the service."
If it’s rule based, you can use a deterministic program that only let a human intervene in controversial cases, instead of a random one that fires whatever it wants without supervision
The whole authorization process is a boondoggle.
Listening to Corey Doctorow on Adam Conover talk about the difference between AI working for humans (good) and humans working for AI that is working for captial (bad). The example he gave was AI helping an individual radiologists (good) and AI replacing nine radiologist so the tenth one could sign off on an AI diagnsosis every two minutes and that doctor only being in the loop as a liability sponge, so they could be held legally liable for mistakes the AI made.
The problems we have with AI largely boil down to problems we have with capitalism, particularly the oligopolic landscape we are currently inhabiting.
There is the background issue of how most of the AI we're using got and is being developed, but your point does fall back down to the idea that it's often not the tool, but how we're using it. Or another way to say it, the human is always the problem.
And it would be politically a little more savvy to understand who our real enemies are, and it's not math professors using AI to solve problems or a programmer using AI to dig through code to find a flaw they know how to fix... it's profit-maxxing CEOs--and those people are a threat to life itself even without AI.

all 4 comments