top 78 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So tired of seeing my congressperson on every one of these lists. I voted against them in the primary, but in the general election my other choice will be someone who openly supports Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That is, alas, the way. Support better candidates when you have the chance, and vote against fascism and genocide when able.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Fact. Not voting might succeed in teaching Dems a lesson about how important it is to vote for bills that contain pro-trans legislation and against bills that contain anti-trans legislation.

    But do you want to know what not voting is far better at? Giving Republicans the power to end us.

    Early election begins in two weeks. Not voting Democrat = voting to exterminate trans people. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either confused or wants us to die.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    I’m seriously considering moving to Marie Gluesenkamp Perez‘s district and challenging her seat. She’s part of the “Blue dog coalition” and votes like she’s MAGA, she’s not any more qualified to do the job than I am, frankly I’m more qualified because she has no actual qualifications.

    Edit: I’m from her state just an hour north, not just some rando

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    AFAIK you don’t have to move. Candidates are not required to live in the district for which they seek office. There are tons of districts across the US with basically unchallenged status quo incumbents who could be easily replaced by progressives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I live in a Republican state (trying to get out), and I just had to watch 3 anti-trans commercials in a row. Hating trans people is fucking catnip to these people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    As a trans person I beg you, do not listen to my sister, Erin. She is not thinking clearly or responsibly about what will happen to us if Democrats lose.

    If you would like to protest on our behalf, please don’t do it by not voting.

    A Republican victory costs the community one seat for one term

    No. Republicans plan to “end” us. Letting them win costs us our very lives.

    Even if that weren’t the case, we are not so selfish as to sacrifice other people, and our planet, just to prove a point.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I feel like Erin has a point.

    I also feel like the Dems in my state are the infinitely better alternative to the scam artist and big pharma conmen the GOP is putting forward. I'd much rather petition Acton and Brown to support the trans community than march in huge protests that are ultimately ignored by their Republican counterparts that are actively trying to harm and denigrate the trans community.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Yeah it feels like most states it's VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO, and a few are so safely Blue that you can vote for like Communist Party and still not have the GoP win

    When it's a choice between "might try to kill trans people" and "Definitely will try to kill trans people" then you have to pick the lesser evil.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 2 months ago (32 children)

    Oh look. Yet another article post primary election to convince people not to vote so the Republican wins the general election.

    If you don't vote you're a moron.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [+] -23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (29 children)

    "Calling out transphobia is bad" - you, probably

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    If this article was before the primaries it would be more helpful and get the right people elected.

    Since this article came out after the primaries and two months before the general it serves only one purpose.

    And it appears your dumbass is taking the bait.

    "I'm not voting because no candidate is perfect and I'll let the party that views me as property win." - your dumbass, without a doubt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I never said I wouldn't vote for the Democrats if I could, the article doesn't say you shouldn't either, just that the author personnaly wouldn't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    the article doesn’t say you shouldn’t either,

    The article literally says:

    Many, myself included, have argued against voting for the worst offenders on this list even where it means a Republican takes the seat.

    What part of that says to you "This is what I'm doing, but you shouldn't do that." - particularly with the second part of the sentence where it's clear they are talking about more than a single vote (their vote).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -10 points 2 months ago

    You're right that the article doesn't say "you shouldn't do that" but that's not what I'm claiming, I'm saying the article says it's up to the readers to consider if transphobia is a deal breaker, if it is then I would say the blame is more on those Democrats for being transphobic, than on the people that are against transphobia

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    I'm sure the Republican opponents in these states will be much better for Trans rights.

    In fact, if we just allow another Republican majority in the legislative branch, they'll probably just fix the whole thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    I never called to vote for Republicans, I didn't even say you shouldn't vote for those Democrats and neither does the article.

    All the article says is that those Democrats are transphobic and that the author, and that's only his view, wouldn't vote for them. I, myself would probably vote for them if I could vote in the US, but I can still understand why the author wouldn't.

    If there was an election between Hitler and Stalin, would you have voted for either one because he was slightly less worse than the other one? I personally wouldn't have, if that is your case too then clearly there is a point where a candidate can be so bad you wouldn't even vote for them if their opponent is worse, that threshold is just different for everyone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    This article does argue for abstaining, it's literally the entire point of writing this article just before midterms:

    Many, myself included, have argued against voting for the worst offenders on this list even where it means a Republican takes the seat. A Republican victory costs the community one seat for one term.

    And it's such a fucking idiotic take.

    It's an article calling out politicians for their answers on "gotcha questions" like 'do you want biological males playing women's sports'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    It's interesting you quote that without showing the previous sentence

    What you do with this information is up to you.

    Also, these politicians didn't just answer poorly to gotcha question, they actively helped pass bills that took away the rights of trans people

    Shomari Figures and Terri Sewell [...] Voted yes [for a bill] banning gender-affirming care for transgender service members

    Mary Peltola [...] One of only six Democrats to vote for [a bill] which contained severe anti-trans and anti-DEI amendments.

    Adam Gray [...] One of only three Democrats to vote for a bathroom ban on military bases for transgender people, along with a sports ban, a gender-affirming care ban, and several other anti-trans amendments to the NDAA.

    Should I keep going or do you think all these bills that marginalize trans people were only "gotcha questions"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    It's interesting you quote that without showing the previous sentence

    Oh please... Just because the author framed the statement with some weasel words doesn't make the intent any less clear. "I'm not telling you what to do, but..."

    Rob Sand, Democratic nominee for governor. Actively opposes transgender participation in sports, answering “no” when a conservative radio host asked whether “biological males” should play women’s sports.

    When you pile weak examples like this into your list, it's clear that you're just trying to discredit any Democrat and discourage voting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Taking away an oppressed minorities right is "weak", what would you consider strong evidence of them being transphobic then? Would they have to start directly beating trans people while calling them slurs? Because if you don't consider taking away trans people rights transphobic then you don't have any right to say who trans people should vote for.

    Edit: Also I'm not trying to discredit all Democrats, only the transphobic ones

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The right to play women's highschool sports isn't the one we're fighting for right now. Yes, it's a long road to acceptance, yes we have to pick our battles.

    No, opening that can of worms on a low rent conservative talk radio show is not worth jeopardizing a Democratic politicians' overall viability with the general voting public.

    Beyond that, the sports issue does have nuance, and for the 95% people in Iowa who've never had a conversation with a person they knew was trans, and the 68-80% of the state who can't read at a highschool level... Yes nuance in the subject doesn't really exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not talking about the right to play women's sports being discussed on radio though. I'm talking about the votes that you seem to be ignoring that are meant to take away access to trans healthcare or restrict access to bathrooms or force trans women to go into men's prisons where they are at a higher chance of being raped. You say the rights to play women's sports isn't the one you're fighting for, but these people aren't fighting for any transgender rights and are actually taking them away, a fact that you have not yet talked about other than calling it ''weak" even when it makes the lives of trans people miserable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    More than half of the people listed in this article are solely on it for trans sports issues (15 out of 27).

    It's an article who's sole purpose is discouraging Democrats from voting in the midterm.

    The author is likely not even a real person.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    How many of those bills do you think would have even been up for consideration if republicans weren't the majority?

    Yeah, democrats could be a lot better, but of the two options we have, a democrat majority is clearly the better choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago

    But neither me nor the article is saying to vote for Republicans, it's just showing that these democrats voted for transphobic laws, if readers decide that that makes them not want to vote, then maybe the blame should be on the Democrats that willingly took away the rights of an oppressed minority and not on the people that don't want to compromise on trans rights

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (9 children)

    This article suggests that you should avoid Xavier Becerra (essentially in favor of Steve Hilton) because he (correctly) pointed out the CA state constitution doesn't protect trans people playing in sports.

    You can go ahead and look up what Becerra has done in support of trans people vs what Steve Hilton has done. Spoilers: Steve Hilton referred to trans people playing in the CIF championship as a 'violation' of the state constitution and held a 'Save Girls Sports' conference. He is outright anti-trans.

    Adam Gray (D) is essentially an anti-trans centrist piece of shit, however whatever he's done pales in comparison to what Kevin Lincoln II's (R) stated position on trans people is.

    So no, this isn't 'calling out transphobia' - this is more DSA brainrot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    What does this have to do with DSA?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    DSA types only swing at Democrats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    DSA are Democrats, just progressive ones like Bernie AOC Mamdani etc. They literally run as Dems and would never discourage you from voting. Activism is a big part of their brand.

    If you’re talking about the chucklefuck reactionary edgelords and ID-politic protest non-voters on Lemmy, I dont know if these have a name. Accelerationist doomers describes some. Hardline single issue voters would probably describe the rest who aren’t bots or feds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Here's the thing, Hasan Piker explicitly did not support Kamala during the 2024 election cycle. Hasan Piker is one of, if not the biggest, DSA proponent.

    I simply disagree with the idea that DSA types would 'never discourage' me from voting. That just isn't true.

    I think you're spot on about the accelerationist doomers and whatever other adjectives you'd like to describe the people here with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Sorry for delay. Not on twitch and had to read up on this guy. He has no DSA affiliation, certainly nothing formal. He appears to be politically aligned but his wiki makes no mention of DSA and his influence appears to be primarily in online/streaming spaces rather than in traditional political organizing or offline movements.

    The reason I say DSA won’t discourage you from voting is because they are a political organization with a strategy built around reform, which is impossible with single-issue purity testing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Trying to suggest that Hasan Piker isn't heavily associated with the DSA means that you really just don't know anything about the man. He is absolutely their biggest voice, even if he isn't technically an accredited member.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    lol I literally just said I didn’t know him slick

    OK so I’ll make a twitch channel dedicated to telling everyone what great friends you and I are. I’ll talk you up every chance I get. We’ll just be inseparable in the twitchy verse, you dig? I’ll become your spokesperson to all the twitches on there, and say whatever I want on your behalf because seriously, what twitcher is interested in who you actually are if you’re not even on the twitch?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Dude, this is such a small brained take.

    You need to understand that news takes place where people are engaging. This is why Facebook, Xitter, Twitch, YouTube, TikTok and whatever other popular social media are where most people get their news nowadays. Behaving like one of the most popular news spaces for young people in the U.S. is inconsequential is so god damn devoid of any thought it makes me angry that I need to engage with such a stupid fucking take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    this is such a small brained take

    Well you know us “DSA types”

    news takes place where people are engaging

    Not all reality tho

    Facebook, Xitter, Twitch, YouTube, TikTok and whatever popular social media are where most people get their news

    That’s great for them

    it makes me angry that I need to engage with such a stupid fucking take

    Clearly

    Look I’m in my 30s and don’t have time for games. If Hasan can actually motivate people in their 20s to participate in something off-platform, in the real world, where elections happen, and if he’s willing to do the work to mobilize votes, then I’d say that makes him an organizer, and I’d be happy to work beside him. But until he brings in those votes, his popularity on a gaming streamer platform means less than nothing to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    It’s not an anti-trans Democrat. It’s a Republican who ran as Democrat

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Which ones?

    Most of these states will never elect a progressive Dem (as proven by the primaries over and over again). Someone left of center is far better than a Republican.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    “Normal” Democrats are slightly right of center.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Okay, so which of the Dems named here are Republicans running as Democrats? I just want to look up the rest of their policies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    If you don’t know by now, what’s the point in me telling you? It’s over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    whoopsie doodle your mask slipped

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    Nah. They're right. If you have to ask at this point in the game, it's a dead giveaway you won't care what the answer is.

    Go on and vote to support the slow creep towards fascism over the sprint towards fascism. The fascists love that you're trying. They all know how to boil a frog.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Hey watch, I can make false statement too: you never voted for Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This is wrong. All people deserve equal rights, and if they don't support that they should leave the Democratic party. It's supposed to be foundational values for all, liberty and justice for all, and all that jazz and apple pie, but it really is not. Dems still best for democracy and We The People, but needs improvement.


    It was all a lie,

    Liberty, justice for all,

    The owners get rich

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    This is the problem with the Democratic Party.

    its not a Party. Its 37 parties in a trenchcoat, and there is no unifying idealism, goal, or outlook that binds them to singular purpose outside of the 2 party system crushing all the non-extrem-right-wing people together into the not-extreme-right-wing party (that is slowly becoming more and more right wing because of all the right wing people being forced into it due to the 2 party system)

    You have some people, that genuinely care about the people and think its governments job to serve them, like Mamdani, and AOC, and Bernie Sanders (Who is technically Independent, but is basically a Democrat in everything but affiliation label, since he's always worked so close with them)

    Then you have some people that don't think trans people should have rights/exist, and should be put in prison, but don't want to actively hunt them for sport, which makes them too lefty liberal for Republicans.

    Then you have the actual Republicans like Fetterman, Sinema, and Manchin, who are actual Republicans running as democrats just to act as saboteurs on any democratic vote or cohesion.

    and a whole big spectrum from shit to okay in between.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Democrats only care about the marginalized as far as it keeps them in power. They say idle while Republicans passed over 500 anti trans laws across the country. They talk a big game while they throw the game to Republicans

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Democrats only care about the marginalized as far as it keeps them in power

    Most of the Democratic party is a lot better than this, but we do need to do a much better job of kicking shitheads out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Having spent a decade as a volunteer and then paid Dem campaign staffer and heard the way the people you've never heard of who actually control the levers of power inside the party apparatus talk about trans people, BLM, and anything at all that might fuck up their Wall St gravy train, I can assure you that "most of the Democratic Party" is absolutely not better than this, and the few who are will never be given any power to act against the ones who aren't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    Many, myself included, have argued against voting for the worst offenders on this list even where it means a Republican takes the seat.

    Fascists love your strategy and support.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago* (15 children)

    When Trump ran the first time, I made the point to everyone I know that even if you yourself aren't racist, if you vote for Trump, you're voting for racism, so the difference between you and a racist is too negligible to count.

    The same is true of anyone willing to vote for a transphobic Democrat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    This article tries to claim that Xavier Becerra is transphobic, as if Steve Hilton isn't infinitely worse (also Becerra isn't transphobic, he correctly stated the CA state constitution doesn't protect trans people playing in sports - you can go ahead and research his support of trans people yourself).

    You're a joke of a human being and you're causing far more damage to trans people pushing messages like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Single-issue voters are the bane of democracy and progressive progress. And nothing is more ironic that voting to sign your own death warrant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    So.why are you Blue MAGA types so gung ho for doing it?

    You understand that Neoliberal Austerity is the breeding ground of fascism, right? You are advocating for continuing doing the exact thing that made Trump viable to begin with. Blue No Matter Who is just MAGS with extra steps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    you Blue MAGA types

    Since you'd like to be an uncivil little bitch, you can fuck off to my block list.

    This is how MAGA I am: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck_v._Eiland-Hall

    Where's your fucking receipts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Yeah. You're not really beating the allegations here.

    The fact that you think that's "receipts" is hilarious, honestly. But just in case this is your first time back on the Internet since making the website that I'm very sure you really are the person who made: Blue MAGA is a perjorative thrown at people who are just as deluded in partisan non-reality as the red hat crowd, but Blue flavored. The Blue MAGA prefers the lies on CNN and MSNBC to the lies on Fox News, but is just as attached to their preferred set of lies as the red variety. Y'know. Like someone who thinks Glen Beck matters all that much in the grand scheme of things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    And you seem to be a bootlicking supporter of genocide, transphobia, and Neoliberal Austerity feeding the rise of Fascism.

    Which makes you a multi-millionaire or yet another recipient of the DNC's biannual "Fell for it again" award. If you're unsure which, check your bank balance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    That's about the level of intelligent discourse I expect from Blue MAGA. Thanks for helping make my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm British you fucking idiot

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Blue MAGA is nothing. Dumb ML communities on the internet try to make it a thing, but you guys are irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    25 comments in c/transgender@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post