all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 2 months ago

No shit sherlock. Now build more public transport.

  • source
  • The City of Montreal currently has the goal of reaching a 75 per cent active mode share, including cycling, walking and public transit, by 2050.

    “In order to achieve that level of public transportation use, we need a lot more than just densifying around public transportation,” Roncace said. “We also need to discourage car use...

    Translation: fuck cars

    The only hostile infrastructure that I support is roads that permit cars, but makes them intentionally slower than the public transportation that they have to see running faster in the next lane over

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Seems obvious, but I guess it's good to have more support.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Duck Ford (yes, I know, he isn't in Montreal) and the like don't care and don't read this.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Link to study?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    What if they simultaneously think transit stations lower their property value, high-density housing lowers their property value, but also they are “poor” because they can’t afford to move elsewhere?

    Have you considered their opinions, mhmmmm? /s

  • source
  • Also makes a hell of a lot more sense to build gtid-tied electric busses and trains than electric cars full of heavy batteries ffs

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Ferda jerbs!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    no amount of studies will change jack shit, god could poke their glowing beard out from the clouds and proclaim "build some fucking railways you nonces" and nothing would change.

  • source