all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Next up:

You can't just take cars.

ALSO: You need to get your license first.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    I presume you need to pay them 2.99/hr to have the permission to even hold guns in that store game

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yet another game that seems to confuse realism for fun. Being more realistic can make a game more fun if it benefits from it, but it can just as easily make it worse when done for no reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, I do wonder what that means. People running away from you on the streets isn't a huge deal. But if you can't buy stuff in shops unless you drop your weapon, that's annoying and not much else...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I’ve been playing Cairn and appreciate this.

    Theres many games where climbing is simple. Cairn didn’t pick realism because it’s realistic, but because of the intense experiences real rock climbing can deliver. It makes it nice to even spot out some of the elements on which it subtly designs away from realism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago

    GTA was never a simulation of real life; it's always been a parody of real life.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    It will be interesting to see if this is handled differently between the single player and online experience.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    A GTA game where you can't have guns? Why does anyone wanna play this crap?

  • source