JD Vance could provide neither a timeline for the Iran war to end nor a date when gas prices might sink below pre-war levels during a White House appearance Thursday, suggesting instead it was up to Iran to conclude the conflict that began with joint US-Israeli airstrikes six months ago.

The current hostilities shouldn’t even be called a “war,” Vance argued, since “active combat operations” ended months ago.

“Right now, there is no active shooting,” Vance insisted, despite three consecutive days this week when the US and Iran exchanged fire, including around the Strait of Hormuz.

all 24 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cnn calling it a conflict in the headline, instead of the war that it actually is, is just proving Vance's false point

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago

    I'm beyond caring what Trump says now, but I never cared what Vance said.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's a forever war special military operation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    A special military operation maybe.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago

    We can't do shit about it though. Fucking traitors in Congress.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    The Vietnam war was also not called a war, it was called a police action. It seems the Executive Branch's ability to wage war without congress's approval is a constitutional loophole.

    Edited for clarity

  • source
  • Ah. Say you're a war mongering dictatorship without saying you're the same as Putin and co.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Department of Little Excursions

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    All you Negative Nellies are so eager to dunk on the VP that you can't even hear his point. Sure, there's a "conflict," sure, our militaries are "shooting and bombing and trying to kill each other," but you've missed the important thing, which is all the peace that's happening. See, there was a moment of peace just then. And here's another moment when no one is shooting now. And here -- uh wait, wait just a moment -- here's another moment of peace now.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    Republicans would have to pay widows and orphans benefits if it was a war…

    Soldiers are just expendable. No cost once they are gone.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Its a Moneypit.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Definitely not a war. Just some tit-for-tat shenanigans. A little fun blowing things up. Can't stop the boys getting up to some hijinks now and then.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Well, so long as the Secretary of War isn't involved, then it's probably not a war ...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    He's not even a very convincing puppet.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    When what will end?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Edgar Bergen and Mortimer Snerd (Peter Thiel and Shady Vance). Apologies to Edgar Bergen...and Mortimer Snerd.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The rest of the world wonders when this non war will end so that the painful economic consequences will stop.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Trump Today (and probably other days): "I think the war's going to end immediately after the election because they can't hold out any longer," Trump said of Tehran on Wednesday.

  • source