The Autistici/Inventati case has strong parallels to the recent TikTok ban: Congress banned the social media network under foreign-policy pretexts because American youth were using it to share otherwise First Amendment–protected content. As with the TikTok ban, outlawing Autistici/Inventati is a way to force users to move to services that are more easily monitored and controlled by the U.S. government.

"The idea that an organization that is an alternative host—for email, websites, and other services—could be designated a terrorist organization simply for providing a service that a lot of people want…is scary," says Jillian York, director of international freedom of expression at the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation. "This may sound a little conspiratorial, but the fact that this comes from an administration that is quite cozy with Silicon Valley giants, at a time when distrust of those companies is quite high from various parts of society, doesn't seem to me a coincidence."

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 2 months ago (5 children)

This feels really strange. Like they’re trying to push privacy-concerned people to use this service for some reason

Otherwise why does the USA give the slightest shit about this service?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    private communications is a direct attack on any police state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Do you catch my point though? How many americans were in this platform before this announcement? Maybe a handful?

    It’s just suspicious is my point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Wrong question. It's not about how many Americans.

    It's about which Americans, the kind which would unfortunately be represented amongst A/I's user base in a much greater than average distribution.

    The very inconvenient and ideologically most dangerous to them ones. The ones Authority detests the most, whether Right or Left. The ones whose thoughts are so universally corrosive to the very concept of imposition and exploitation that they are something that both the Capitalist and the Communist both have murdered over to prevent the spread of. Anarchists.

    No Gods. No Masters. Just us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I'm confused, are you trying to say that the service that has been deemed a terrorist organization, and that many ISPs and various organizations are blocking merely because orange cheeto man said so, is somehow benefitting from this?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Wouldn't this mean that Facebook and all other social media and by extension all of their employees are now terrorists as well? Since a terrorist organization could conceivably use Facebook Messenger to quickly plan a terrorist attack moments before committing it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Put the name in the title. Don't just describe it. Say which one.

  • source
  • 22 comments in c/DeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    This is great marketing for Autistici/Inventati by Rubio.

    Edit: also, after reading the article, how long before they come for the Lemmy software and Lemmy instances?

    The State Department's announcement, meanwhile, blames Autistici/Inventati for allowing one of its users "to publish official communiqués and calls to action for U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations," naming Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

    Another Edit: don't those communiqués also get published on twitter?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I certainly didn't know about them before this. 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I had heard the name before, but it certainly hadn't made an impression on me until now. Please see my edit to my previous post too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

    pls make 🗃️s 1st.

    The U.S. State Department and U.S. Treasury placed the anarchist-aligned Italian tech support collective Autistici/Inventati on the "specially designated global terrorist" list on Wednesday. This designation makes it illegal for Americans to engage in any "transactions" with Autistici/Inventati
    […]
    Autistici/Inventati offers free email accounts, web hosting, videoconferencing, and other communications services on request to those who can demonstrate need and "share our principles of anti-fascism, anti-racism, anti-sexism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, and anti-militarism." Unlike commercial email providers, Autistici/Inventati stores only the bare minimum of user data and doesn't peek into users' inboxes, making it appealing to "paranoids," as the group describes itself.

    Now I know which service to sign up to!

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Don't be stupid. If you are an American be very careful. This has the possibility to connect you to "terrorists" and give the government enough to go after you. Who knows for sure but be careful out there folks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Please take a look at my bio b4 u respond.
    I am not fond of Nazis.
    ⅔ of the planet is antifascists. So if you think using a privacy respecting service is “terrorism,” I suggests you cease interactions with me.
    I have insecure 📧 to send. So buzz off if otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like you either have a chip on your shoulder or cant read well, but i am saying the government, not i, will call you a terrorist and use that to target you.

    But sure, rage against allies. Whatever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    im not saying theres no risk but they are going after the infrastructure not people using it (which they use as excuse), it looks like setting stage for weaponizing this law when elections come and people organize peaceful protests against the government

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Sounds to me like this company would be susceptible to a group talking trash about you to get them to cancel you, even if it's not true.

    These types of left political type companies can't be trusted unfortunately. They are picked on and over correct for it on their users for start, for another, the left are fucking sheep being played like a fiddle by the oligarchs at this moment in time.

    They would character assassinate you if you pissed off someone like Israel, and this company would take the word of the proxies talking shit, I strongly presume.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    I love it when people are honest about being enormous pieces of shit. Thanks for making it easy to trim the blatant trolls from my feed. Going through your post history, I find it hard to believe people this dumb really exist in the world so I choose to believe you are either 11 years old or a Russian troll. Again, thanks for making it easy on me. I appreciate you being so awful that you are an automatic block.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Is there a reason authoritarians are attracted to libel, that you have to interact with my post, about my decision to use them for my email needs? Buzz off if you're not providing me far far left internet services. I have a «Do Not Interact» in my bio.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I stopped reading after your half baked accusation. Who gives a fuck what you think by the way? Please don't tell me what to do, I don't give a fuck what you think, with your defective reasoning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    you made contradicting points and ended it like you read zero about the topic you are commenting on, got asked and went off? you are trying to stir wheres not stirred and gaslight about something where people pick up on your talking points

    zero effort on your side to have a discussion

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm hearing a lot of people in the States are pissed at the Republicans over data centers. Hopefully, that results in all these fucks losing their seat at the next election.

    🤣 1
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments