7
Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX (openai.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Comments

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 2 months ago*

Another business bought and destroyed by Musky

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I love it when there's infighting in the world of AI. It's the block size debate all over again.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    11 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 69 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    fuck openai, fuck musk.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] [S] 47 points 2 months ago

    Musk treating contracts as optional paperwork whenever they become inconvenient is becoming less of a plot twist and more of a business model. Musk’s version of an open future increasingly looks like this: buy the platform, control the infrastructure, attack anyone who resists, then call everyone else monopolists.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Drama King Sam Altman

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I think anyone running Open AI would make that call.

    Anyone in that role would be worried about Musk using end users as a way to acquire model distillation data to feed Grok with GTP.

    Musk is a direct competitor, has been feuding with Open AI for years, and he has shown that he’s totally ok with acquiring data in aggressively shady ways.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Yup, but not everybody in charge of OpenAI would have a pissy self indulgent blog post about it produced under the company brand.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That blog post struck me as something pretty boring. It has the stink of a legal and PR team. What was the pissy / self-indulgent part?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's all unnecessary. Cold have just said "we're exercising our option" without all the ethical criticism.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    IMHO, if you have that many enterprise clients, you can’t just nuke product support without a press release that explains the rationale. It’s safer to explain the reasoning and as the last few sentences indicated, help them transition to a new IDE that works with your product.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    I love how "brokethe terms of our contract" still works. Rouxls Kaard out here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The girls are fiiightiiiinggggg

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •