you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I think anyone running Open AI would make that call.

    Anyone in that role would be worried about Musk using end users as a way to acquire model distillation data to feed Grok with GTP.

    Musk is a direct competitor, has been feuding with Open AI for years, and he has shown that he’s totally ok with acquiring data in aggressively shady ways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Yup, but not everybody in charge of OpenAI would have a pissy self indulgent blog post about it produced under the company brand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That blog post struck me as something pretty boring. It has the stink of a legal and PR team. What was the pissy / self-indulgent part?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's all unnecessary. Cold have just said "we're exercising our option" without all the ethical criticism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    IMHO, if you have that many enterprise clients, you can’t just nuke product support without a press release that explains the rationale. It’s safer to explain the reasoning and as the last few sentences indicated, help them transition to a new IDE that works with your product.

  • source
  • parent