Think the roughly $18 Billion Meta has settled for over child safety is a slap on the wrist?

Wait until you see the actual details: πŸ˜€ Paid in annual installments over a 10-year period

😜 States receive the money, not the victims

πŸ€‘ 30% will only be paid if YouTube & TikTok:

"...pay an amount matching the 30% figure "...implement a one-hour Daily Limit, Night Mode, and age assurance measures"

https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/agreement-with-state-attorneys-general-supporting-teens/

Meta even wrote a wonderfully open letter to their competitors!

Sadly now everyone will have to verify themselves, too bad for Meta, now they will have to collect even more data - which we know they totally oppose and hate ;)

Screenshot of META page with An Open Letter to TikTok and YouTube to Join Us in Supporting Teens From August 26,2026 Source: https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/open-letter-to-tiktok-and-youtube-to-join-us-in-supporting-teens/

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How in the fuck can meta get away with saying they won't pay 30% of their fine unless competitors pay it and implement the same things?!?!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    There is only one way to stop the tech-capitalism. Revolution (Not in the technical sense of transitioning to better technologies, in the sence of French Revolution)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 14 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I think limiting from the platform is not a good option. For some teens with a horrible family (domestic violence for example), social media maybe the only shelter they could turn to. Also, those companies tend to break open web and require an account and even verification in the name of protecting child. DNS blacklist enforced by parents is probably a better option IMO.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I was that teen! Online social platforms saved my life when abusive and helicopter-y parenting was gunning for the opposite. That was a different time, though, the internet has gotten significantly worse.

    Seriously, people need to just be decent goddamn parents. I don't understand why you'd have a child these days if you don't know how to navigate parental controls on-device and on the network level. You'd be neglecting your child otherwise, shit's different nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    The impact of social media on young minds has been shown to be quite pernicious. We need to limit screen time for young adults so we don't end up with another generation of tablet kids who are socially stunted and encounter difficulties interacting with coworkers when they enter the job market.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I like how they are trying to drag down other platforms with them. Not that they don't deserve it, just shows they really do stop at nothing to tarnish their name at every turn.

    Just fucking take the slap on the wrist, apologize and lie and say you'll do better like every other corperation and maybe people will at best forget about you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    What expertise did they rely on to come to this particular set of limits?

    I would have hoped the list would look more like

    -Meta must divest entirely from the social media arm of their business

    -Prosecutions for each decisionmaker who ignored internal evidence that their products were causing harms

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    dont be confused, this is what peak democracyβ„’ looks like. the system working as intended.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    how is this relevant to privacy? Unless I'm missing something the only privacy related thing would be if they increased their age verification requirements more.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 5 comments in c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    how do they determine if the user is a minor?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • 1 comment in c/DeTikTok@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    They only care about their competitors because they'll be the ones scraping up the extra ad revenue. No one actually cares about the children. Almost as bullshit as the Sackler payout for causing the opioid endemic.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/technology@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    I ain't gonna verify shit...

    I don't use their garbage, and will continue to not use their garbage. if anything else I use gets attacked, I'll abandon that too upto and I clouding the internet entirely. idgaf.. corporations are cancer and I won't play on the same sandbox as them. they are literally enemies of the free world

  • source