This is the damning fact:

Epidemiologist Michael Baker told Stuff it was difficult to properly monitor influenza and other winter illnesses, because high-quality surveillance programmes were discontinued, including the Ministry of Health not renewing its contract for the FluTracking tool for cost-saving reasons.

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

I wonder how much it would cost to offer the flu vaccine for free; every year?

Would it be cheaper than the loss from a bad flu? Probably.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    It costs about $20 to get it from my local pharmacy. There are about five million people.

    Let's assume that the government/pharmac/healthnz/whomever could source five million doses at a good rate and fund the staffing requirements to administer them. Say that is the same $20/dose cost.

    $100m or about ten metres of motorway.

    The best part is you don't need to do all five million, I think about 80% is enough for herd immunity to take effect. So it's cheaper at $80m.

    'flu takes about a week to recover from. So every person that gets it 'costs' their employer a week's wages. Call that $25/hr × 40hr = $1000/wk. We'd only need to stop 80,000 people from getting 'flu each year to break even. NZ had almost half a million cases in 2025.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    It seems that the math, maths quite well here.

    Hospital stays are a big expense.

    For context, 3 out of 5 of my family got the flu this year. One ended up in hospital for 2 nights.

    Preventing 1000 hospital nights had to be worth quite a lot also.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments