If it'll mow down bollards, it'll mow down toddlers. It can't distinguish between the two.
post
Question: what value do self driving taxis add to regular taxis? I can't think of any. All that money poured into something that solves no problem at all and just creates more, killing human jobs in the process. It's so stupid.
Tesla is giving robo-taxis a bad rep. Why is Musk so insistent on optical-only? Sunk cost fallacy? Even the increased processing power required alone could probably already offset the more expensive LIDAR, not to mention the research and loss in revenue.
Lol.YOLO! - this tesla
A full minute of processing power and the best it could come up with was crashing through a divider and ending up in the far lane
I used to be real hyped about self-driving cars. I thought it would be just the answer we needed to our profound lack of public transportation. But after they took off the LIDAR system, it just became a money grab. And what was I thinking anyway? Self-driving cars? the answer to no public transportation? As if you'd want one of these cheap systems in charge full of a BUS of people?
My ex-wife was right. Shoulda just went with fucking trains. But we can't, because an ego-maniacal billionaire wants to be a trillionaire. Reason #4,506 of why I hate living in the United States
*flex posts. Comments on reddit locate it here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/VZRjSc325Kg7Vpq17
Yeah it shouldn't have gone in there because of the white line. But shouldn't there also be at least one other flex post there blocking it?
Either way, at least it managed to get out appropriately.
I'm honestly surprised that a Tesla Model Y fit in this gap. Maybe it ran over the first bollard a bit?

Edit: And, IDK, "managed to get out appropriately" in this case would unfortunately mean throwing it in reverse and doubling back through the cross-walk, I think. It's never a good idea to run stuff over to get where you're going.
I was just looking into this a bit more, “managed to get out appropriately” is potentially actually going through the bollard after it fucked up.
It broke the law going in there, but reversing through the intersection (crosswalk) to get out is also against the law in Austin and many many places.
I know a lot of people do it (and I think I've seen a Tesla do it before too) but if you're stopped at an intersection and you fuck up and are slightly in the crosswalk, you're in most places, not allowed to back up. If you back up, you could actually be cited for 2 infractions, one blocking the intersection, and then another for the backing up. (edit: and in this case, it's just a matter of property damage if they go over it, and they're plastic because they know people will hit them, which is also sad)
I really doubt the car was smart of enough to realize I'm not allowed to reverse, and i could safely drive over this though. I think something else in its decision making process happened with failures all over the place.
I can't wait to see what the NHSTA report on this one says, hopefully there's some meaningful info in it.
Maybe we'll even hear it called home for help and a person drove it over? There was one report where a support person remotely drove it into a chain at slow speed.
Yeah it ran over the first flex post.
You don't want to back over flex posts, because if there's one still under the vehicle, it's going to end up like a spear in the belly of an animal. I once saw someone parked like that and was morbidly curious to see what happened when they tried to leave.
Getting out appropriately would have been reversing to the place where it entered the flex-posted area, not simply smashing through them.
To be fair that looks like a shitty implementation of the bollards.
I wonder if it might also include outdated maps and this is newer infrastructure?
Still not an excuse, it should have seen it and not crossed the white line, but maybe it had conflicting info and chose wrong?
An automatic car should take into account any obstacle in the path whether or not it matches a map.
It did take the obstacles into account though at first. It was going very slowly and managed to squeeze itself into that bad spot, before ultimately realizing it was stuck and deciding to go over them once it had gone too far (I would love to know how the fuck it decided to do that last part though)
What it didn't take into account from the start was the white line or bike lane sign, but those first bollards on their own it made it past.
If it had bad navigation data, that could have conceivably played a part, but bad map data seems less likely given there's an image of that intersection from 2024.
Everything about this was still very bad obviously, but even if it wasn't the case here, bad map data could get you into a bad situation like that if you can drive between the initial bollards.
Jesus Christ, it shouldn't be squeezing through such a small gap in bollards on a fucking road. That should be a massive red flag that it is going the wrong way on top of the well marked white lines. If some random person did it we would be mocking them for being stupid no matter how well they kept from scratching the paint in the process.
It did a shit job the whole video. Stop making excuses for it.
Im not saying it should, and in this case and have clearly said what it did was wrong.
Im just trying to reason out how or why something like that may have happened, and at first bad map data seemed like it could be part of it wtf went wrong. (edit: even OP said they looked into it, implying they thought that might be a factor too!)
Road says go right. Oh shit its tight but I can make it. Im fucked. YOLO!!!!
And yes, it shouldn't have ignored the bicycle signage or the white line.
Have you never driven around a construction local traffic road only sign that gets placed in the middle of the road or blocking a lane? AVs need to be able to do weird things like this, but in the correct situations, which this was not.
I actually looked into that...!
The Google Maps interface lets you see when the street was imaged. It's been that way since 2024, at least. A helpful Redditor shared the link to it.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/VZRjSc325Kg7Vpq17
I'm bad as an automotive journalist. What I lack in skill, I make up for with effort and comedic timing
top 44 comments