all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 2 months ago

Lol people thinking South Korea was the one resisting any sort of cooperation.

I love the tankies who seem to think North Korea will be the one to absorb South Korea or something..

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Don’t forget that the north has sold most of their artillery stock piles off to Russia and sent many of their troops to Ukraine. A huge part of their position was having that massive artillery stockpile aimed at Seoul. They are in a much weaker position, militarily, and much more stable with the building materials, food, and cars they’ve received in return.

    The long-term outlook isn’t very good, but for now there is less of a need for military presence and war preparation on the peninsula.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I mean if the country you relied on for defence for the past 7 decades suddenly tells everyone that they're not going to back any of their allies up any more, raids your air defence system missile stocks for some mad war in the Middle East, and vacates the area, what would you do?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Flip side. The country pointing it's gun at you for the last few decades is suddenly sending troops and most of it's arms to the European theater. Maybe we can talk now

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Giving the Kim dynasty anything is a mistake. They will take the idea and spin it as if they successfully negotiated peace even though the world was against them. They will portray it as if they have the superior military might. In the end, through NK people still suffer.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It seems that their economy has been booming lately, with Russia buying their stockpiles and China dumping some of their excess prodution on them. I have no idea if that growth actually translates to a better life for their people but I really doubt they'd be better off with a shrinking economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Could be looking to cash out if they can get garenteed immunity as part of the deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    Riiiiiiiigggghhhhhhht. As if the NK gov. actually wants peace.

    Edit: how many times have they walked away from talks?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Looks to me that they do want peace. And that they also want to be constantly on the brink of war so they have an official enemy to placate their population, but no further than the brink.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    There's been an outbreak of civil rest

  • source
  • 7 comments in c/funny@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    No way all conflicts around the world have been artificially fueled by the US.

    No way, right...?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    When the poison leaves the body, then the healing can begin.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    They should close down any US embassies, just to be sure.

  • source