We will often get people who respond to review comments by copy-pasting them into their LLM, then copy-pasting its response back onto GitHub. Bluntly: this is a waste of everyone's time. If we wanted an LLM's opinion, we could have asked it ourselves. We want to hear your thoughts, not a machine's.

Imagine being so naive you actually think you're contributing anything by being the middle man between a real dev and an LLM.

I wonder when bun will migrate to something else

Moreover, this is a breach of trust between the reviewer and the author. Our assumption when we review is that we're talking to a real person who wants to do their best work.

I think this is a really excellent point and gets at a general feeling I've had towards LLM-generated PR comments for a while now. I can understand the desire to use LLMs to generate changes (my company pushes AI super hard and it genuinely is a helpful tool in many cases), but to delegate discussion of those changes to an AI model feels extremely antisocial to me. I don't really like the idea of vibe-coding in general, and this practice really distills down everything I don't like about it with an added layer of deception.

direct link to the policy

https://forge.rust-lang.org/policies/llm-usage.html