I think next DCU movie should just be Krypto. That’s Avatar levels of money.
post
This type of movie is only a drag if you are a sex trafficker.
It was a total waste. Now we have 2 people from Krypton on Earth. The only two. I expected a story about Clark and his hot blonde cousin working hard to repopulate their species. They don't even talk about it!
Like... come on. We all want to have sex with our hottest cousin. We don't because stupid society says it's wrong. But if we were the only two humans left so suddenly banging our hot cousin was something we had to do for the survival of the human race? Fucking JACKPOT.
What kind of a weirdo totally ignores the story we all want to see? It writes itself.
Have you ever heard of projection?
I can tell you never read the comics I did.
This meme is so confusing, do I read it top to bottom or bottom to top?
Except the dog was poisoned and sad. It wasn't "awww doggie" it was "awww sad doggie." Also Supergirl didn't have her powers for like 3/4ths of the movie (due to her character's own stupidity). Like they couldn't write a decent story if she had powers.
I think that's kind of the main issue with any character that has Superman-level powers, they're so OP that it sort of limits what you can do to keep the story interesting. You basically have:
-
Try to make the powers irrelevant and embroil them in a complicated psychological/moral issue (great if it works but difficult to pull off and not especially visually interesting for a superhero movie.)
-
Create an enemy with the same power level as them (then you just basically have two invincible characters bouncing off each other and smashing everything around them (visually interesting but essentially no stakes.)
-
Have them lose their powers in some convoluted way and then get them back at the climax of the movie to do an ass-kicking scene (which seems to be the default.)
I think it's the same problem that The Boys TV show had - at first there was kind of a tension about them just being normal people and Homelander being so powerful that he could hear their heartbeats from half a mile away and level the entire city they were hiding in if he knew they were there, but the longer it went on the more preposterous it got that he hadn't just squished them yet. Especially when the show has them meet face-to-face multiple times and he either lets them go because reasons or they escape somehow.
I don't think that's true at all, and there are nearly 100 years of Superman comics full of stuff that doesn't fit that. I feel like you are commenting on the movies specifically and coming to the conclusion that these are the ONLY choices.
When they make a movie, they are OBSESSED with the 2nd idea. An enemy with equal power. Which is why we've seen 2 movies starring general Zod, despite him not being that major of a character. It's why we got Doomsday in the Justice League movie. Hollywood filmmakers are clearly in love with the idea of two super people bouncing off buildings for 90 minutes. In the comics though, this would be boring as hell. "Essentially no stakes" as you put it. Correct. It's boring. I hate that the movies always want Superman to become this. Because it's not what the comics are like at all.
There are many options you have missed. There are limits to Superman's powers. Remember that these are from detective comics. A good Superman comic involves a mystery for Clark Kent/Superman to solve. Like who is supplying Intergang with weapons. A good episode from the kids cartoon show starts with Clark Kent being assassinated, then Superman trying to figure out who did it and why. Superman Red Son (which has a cartoon movie with some changes), puts Superman in the USSR instead of Kansas, for truth, justice, and the communist way. Again, not remotely any of the 3 plot lines you have suggested.
Superman (2025) did a great job with this. Yes you've got an "equal" super-being for him to fight (Hollywood wouldn't accept anything less), but ultimately it's about Lex Luthor and the plot behind it all.
The Boys is a poorly written show that loves violence. They ran out of ideas within a couple years. Not surprised at all that everyone hated the ending. They wrote themselves into a corner very early on. They were always pushing the idea that violence was the answer, very unlike Superman in nearly every way. The fact that you see this as comparable to Superman is pretty frustrating. Frankly I think the whole show is a bit of a middle finger to Superman. It's literally a show about how much they think Superman sucks. The show that's about Superman sucking, isn't a satisfying portrayal of Superman? Shocker.
Like... "Superman" is Clark Kent. A reporter who discovers crime, then he also has the powers to stop it. But the "Superman" you describe is a super-being who is boring when he bounces off buildings, always being power scaled or losing his powers so that the fights will be interesting for Hollywood. Do you see the difference?
I think the issue was more DC's power scaling issues. It's kinda hard to write a compelling story for Superman or Batman at their peak, because they are, for the most part, invincible and flawless according to DC. I suspect that her not having the ability to access her powers for 3/4 of the movie was an effort to make her seem like a Marvel superhero with flaws and relatability. Unfortunately, DC doesn't know how to do that, as Marvel doesn't even know how to do that consistently. Power creep is a real problem if you can't just magic away the hero's basic invulnerability.
This is one of the issues that Invincible tackled quite nicely at least until the end of season 2. I haven't gotten around to watching season 3.
Couldn't get past season 1 of Invincible. You won't like what I thought about it. But I'm a Superman fan who doesn't like excessive violence, so hopefully you can understand where I'm coming from.
Nah, I get it. I wouldn't have gotten to season 2 if I had watched season 1 before season 2 was already out. Season 1 ended on the WORST POSSIBLE down note that they could, and I think they did that intentionally.
Minor spoilers: it's not like they ended season 2 on a good note, just that Nolan and Markus do finally find a common ground against Nolan's objectives.
It won't end in a satisfying way. They never do. Game of Thrones or The Boys or any violence-focused show. Terrible endings, all of them.
EDIT: Breaking Bad did okay by killing everyone, including an unrealistic machine gun in the trunk.
Apparently the machine gun thing actually works. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=06t_KP7y8Ao
Maybe, maybe not. The Boys was written from 2006-2012 in comicbook form, and they followed all storylines almost exactly as written. The ending of The Boys was predetermined because they were adapting an already written story that they didn't want to change.
Invincible was written over the timeframe of 2003-2014 in comicbook form. They have already ignored major plot points to make Invincible a bit more palatable to a wider audience. I suspect that they will end it in much the same way the original ended, with Nolan and Markus being the undisputed protectors of Earth, but not having any real power on Earth, via actual laws and standings.
It also kind of made the villains seem a bit daft. The rule seemed to be red sun = no powers, green sun = kills her, yellow sun = super powers and the main villain seemed to be pretty powerful no matter where he was, and they establish early on that there are lots of red sun planets where people live, so literally just hide out anywhere without a yellow sun and you're 100% safe?
Until she calls her friends in the Lantern Corps, or you know just gains a Red power ring of her own
and she recovered from the poison with yellow sun power, but the dog couldn't?
Maybe this would have been better written with ChapGPT.
Yes! That was plot hole that frustrated me early on.
They said that moving Krypto would accelerate the poison so he would have died before they got to a yellow sun.
Yeah that's pretty nonsense though. Superman can literally die for days/weeks and come back to life with the sun's power. Krypto should be able to also.
Hmmm doggie? Which movie was this again? Asking for a friend
I was loving this movie until it started being a superhero movie. It was a really cool scifi experience till then
Movie was solid 7.2/10. People just cry all over because superhero, because woman, because "what if" or because of some dumb thing.
Can someone explain what the aww doggie part means? Is it sex scenes?
The dog sucked. I wish they used a real one. The cgi was just very rough, and I felt nothing for it all movie because of this fact.
I like all that. Really liked what she did to that one jackass at the end--- made me like her a bit more.
Did not like dog being hurt, dog being left, dog almost dying. Did not like! 😭
Edit: omg I just realized why the Cons hated this movie! It's in the second line of the OP's post.
I thought lobo was the villain. Is lobo a sex trafficker in this movie?
It's hero slop good guy beats bad guy
That's a lot like John Wick. Aww, doggie. Kill Russians. Aww, doggie.
One could claim that was kinda the plot of The Boondock Saints, though that was a bit different.
More like, "ok these guys back each other up no matter the outcome." "They hooked up with a friend of their's that happens to be a low level package boy for the mob." "Aww. Kitty." "Holy fuck why did you accidentally kill the kitty‽" "Kill Russian mobsters until they don't have any influence in Boston anymore, and maybe branch out to other cities."
Meh... still not going to watch it
She is a complete narcissist in this movie. Has zero heroic attributes, has no kindness or compassion, competely self obsessed.
Yep. That's the point. She is just a person who lost her parents and home, and is trying to make sense of her life.
I don't think you understand what a narcissist is. And in the story, in literally every story about Supergirl, her family, her friends, everyone she ever knew, died horribly in front of her and she ends up surviving. There is such a thing as survivors guilt and it is pretty brutal.
But hey, feel free to be pissed that it isn't a clone of the Superman movie but with a girl.
There's no way to have watched the movie and completely missed that her love for her dog is driving everything she does.
Wonder if people would have the same criticism if the character was a man instead lol
Men get so much more space to be antisocial than women do
More like:
-
Nobody cares about this part
-
Lobo shows up
-
Nobody cares about this part either
And Lobo wasn't that cool anyways.

Shame. The Superman film was solid. You'd like to think they could crank a few more out in that vein.
Im conflicted,
if that waste of breath sorbo is disappointed, that would normally indicate it was doing something right.
He wasn't disappointed, he was supposed to act disappointed. But he's so dumb he thought that was a speech line and chose to yell it out.
This meme is a constant reminder of how dumb Kevin Sorbo is.

all 68 comments