Recent reports have raised alarm about the use of PatronScan, an ID-checking and face-scanning system, at multiple LGBTQ+ bars in San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood. Much of the attention has focused on reports that the system photographs patrons as they enter venues and questions about whether those images are used for facial recognition

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Malice? Ignorance? Plenty of both to go around.

The morning after we chatted in the Castro, [25-year-old data analyst Ben] Gonzalez told me over Instagram DM that he was unaware Mix could share patron data with neighboring businesses but did not see a problem with it. “I think it’s cute that they share it amongst other bars,” he wrote. “It’s like a little cybersecurity community .”

https://sf.gazetteer.co/why-do-these-castro-gay-bars-have-tsa-style-face-scanners

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    mostly first. most gay bars are run by straight businesses men. just like most landlords are banks. just because your clientele belongs to a specific group or caste, doesn't mean you must belong to them...

    why this distinction is important is precisely why this comparison is more accurate than you realise. both of these will sell you out of everything for financial gain... and with ICE, it's coming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    To imprison them later.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Oh just when i was in danger of venturing out sometime.

    Oh well.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Why does the German State have a database of everyone's religion when they make Anmeldung, including literally a database of all the Jews and where they live?

    Because some orgs are so interested in collecting all the data, that they never stop and think if they should have that data

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Queer person here: OH MY GOD WHAT THE FUCK, THIS IS WHY WE TEACH LGBT HISTORY! If there is one group that should know better it's the LGBT community, especially now with what's happening to transgender people because holy shit.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

    The insurance industry has been pushing for them for decades. It's not just about LGBQT people. As someone who has been a bouncer for over a decade, it's kind of a necessary evil if we want to have clubs/bars/venues at all (in this day and age, in this culture).

    The system scans your ID and matches it with security footage from in the venue. This is effectively the only way to consistently enforce bans in a larger venue with a multi-person security team.

    Arguably the only gripe one can make privacy wise is the collection/storage of gov't ID. As obviously venues have security cameras and can assign that footage to patrons as they see fit (like liquor stores do with thieves).

    While I encourage people to avoid such venues, please don't hold the owners directly accountable as they may not have had a choice.

    edit: Every time I get downvoted for simply stating facts lemmings don't like I'm reminded that taking y'all seriously is a waste of time.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Imo it is best to not take downvotes seriously as people don't put thought into them beyond "this comment seems to contradict my opinion" and they also don't really affect anything, the best solution is to disable them from showing up in the settings and consider the thoughts of people bothering to write a response instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    disable them from showing up in the settings

    Hell ya thank you.

    If I could I would turn off inbox notifications cuz I know which comments are going to attract the idiots before I post them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    So a polaroid picture of the banned person being posted where the IDs are being checked is too complicated then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    too complicated

    It's not scaleable.

    Imagine trying to rely on that system in a club of >500 patrons with 15 security guards and 2 entrances?

    Imagine waiting in line to get in while they check every single face against a wall of 100+ photos

    Also at what point is this trouble maker going to sit nicely so I can get a recognizable photo in a dark room with smoke strobe lights?

    Lets say I ban a guy mid-shift. How do I communicate that to the rest of the security team? Leave my door to show everyone the photo? Have everyone else leave their post to check the wall?

    What you're saying works, it just doesn't scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Probably so they can be bitchy and catty and gossip about each other even more. Wait, gay men's bars or gay women's bars? Because gay women don't do that nearly as much.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    Damn. Some people need to know their history before building a database of people/communities

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Yeah I think lots of bars are doing this now, so that info about unruly customers propagates between them. I don't think I've gone into a bar since before November 2019 (when Covid hit) and will probably keep staying out of them. Back then at least though, folks old enough to obviously be over 21 usually didn't get carded. I guess that has changed.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, this is very very bad.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/Independent_Media@lemmy.today view that post
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Guessing owners were targeted sales opportunities after one of the nearby lgbt club attacks, since it’s clustered in that neighborhood, and they may not be technically savvy so I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt, but they need to realize that this is a fox in the henhouse situation with respect to their local queer community and not a safe way to protect their patrons.

    E: typos

  • source