no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
7 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
[–] 13 points 3 months ago

It’d be a shame if the cameras all ended up smashed!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The local news keeps talking about how crimes were solved with flock cameras

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago*

    Everytime the issue of surveillance comes up on my local news stations there is some official from the police or Flock. If they interview someone with concerns, it’s never someone from EFF or a privacy advocate, but a random person on the street who has concerns but thinks the cameras have been integral to solving crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    that's what they make stickers for.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago
    2 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    The councilman said the cameras will be abused less because they

    • renewed for only 6 months instead of more
    • put "wagons around Flock"?
  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Vote out every one of them.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Cleveland doesn’t rock…

  • source