Can we not change the name of what we do? It's not handcrafted coding, it's coding. The other variant is vibecoding.
post
Can't believe you only accept people that write code by hand, stop discriminating people that write with their feet.
/j
Get on the AI industry hit list here.
Nah, just kidding.
👋 If you would like to add your name to the directory, here's how to do it!
- Edit this file in your own fork.
- Submit the edit as a PR. In the description of the PR, supply some sort of social or technical proof that you have authored handcrafted code and it is currently in production. "In production" can mean either an app/service that people in public are using, or software module(s) being used by other publicly known software (aka an open source library).
- We will review your submission and, if it looks legit, we will publish it on handcraftedcode.org!
Sounds interesting but I'm not sure I can provide proof. I work on closed source software for a company and don't really have any online presence outside of this account.
I do everything the normal way (no LLMs) and am probably the only person left at my company doing so.
Perhaps submit yourself anyway and just put that explanation into the pull request. I don't think the list is designed to be super bullet proof, I was merged without directly linking any code too (although I suppose it's not too hard to find). At the end of the day, a lot of the internet runs on the honor system still, for better and for worse.
Sounds complicated, I'll ask Claude to do it for me 👌
Kind of funny (or sad?) that lemmy itself probably wouldn't make it on the list, given they seem adamant on allowing LLM coding: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-docs/pull/414/changes
Curiously enough I wasn't able to actually find any lemmy commit marked as created with the help of AI, other than some bug located by AI without indication that an AI fix was used. I wonder if that means either they don't adhere to their own rule, or whether they're not actually using AI but just felt like really being pro-AI anyway. Why though? I'm so curious.
Update: seems like they don't put it into the commit log, just the merge request info: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/6304
Are we allowed to use LLMs to review code as long as we make changes by hand?
Well I'm not the site maintainer, but I'd argue that this would be fine. The question is about whether you're writing the code yourself: understanding what you're writing line by line rather than taking an "agent" to do the work, robbing you of that understanding.
Accepting criticism/review from a bot or a human for that matter wouldn't interfere with that understanding, so I'd argue that it doesn't apply.
There is however the ethical question of paying for such a bot, given that it's the product of massive IP theft and environmental arson. It probably doesn't apply to this specific declaration though.
Sometimes but I suck in general.
Sometimes I just use the logic flow chart thing some engines (like UE) have. But mostly by hand. Never AI, tho.
all 24 comments