The sheer irony of APPLE making a neuromancer adaptation...
post
It seems promising that Gibson has been pleased with the production: https://bsky.app/profile/greatdismal.bsky.social/post/3mrj4rzfqnc24
My first impression is that there are fates worse than development hell.
Hope it's good! Emphasis on hope.
Somehow even the grimy alley where MC's getting beat down is bright and sunny. How tf did that happen? Oh yeah it's by Apple TV...

That guy was pretty good in GREEN ROOM (the only thing I've seen him in). I guess an insistent EXXXTREME techno soundtrack is supposed to inspire some kind of excitement in people.
This looks awesome! Can't wait! Sure, would have been nice if it was more grimy, but I'll take it.
been waiting decades for this hope they don't mess it up
By making the world and characters super-cool and attractive they already missed the point completely. This looks horrible.
I hope they keep all the howlers, like when the space pilot doesn't know what a computer virus is.
"Creators"?
Showrunners get distinct “creator” credits for TV series that have been adapted from previous works, with distinct “based on ____ by ____” credits for the source material.
I’m not a huge fan of the wording either, but I’m trying to stick with industry standard nomenclature until I figure out something better.
Gibson must have run out of watch money.
Bit rude!
Not a single scene in this trailer reminds me of the book I have on my bookshelf and have read several times. Also Gibson said in the past that he was happy for Neuromancer to be a book and maybe a video game, but not made into a 'Hollywood Property". He could have changed his mind, or thought it would make a great troll in his later years( he is famous for trolling the CBC in the late 60's about what life was as a barefoot hippie that shared everything with strangers played by all his friends) but when he wanted something made into a movie or a TV show it was. Except Irodru for some reason.
Hopefully it’s only loosely based on the source material. Neuromancer is among the worst books in the genre it invented.
Read the book decades ago and enjoyed it. Why do you say it's terrible?
The story has almost zero action, the characters are insipid and undeveloped, and the prose is wholly unremarkable. I think Neuromancer is popular because it’s popular, which is not uncommon.
What do you think about the cyberpunk genre?
Edit: went through your comment history, and you seem to have a pattern of shit takes. At least you're consistent.
The prose is one of the best parts imo. The main character has had his mind and body modified and drugged to the point of constantly being confused. The chaotic writing helped put the reader in that headspace.
Immediately more excited by this trailer than the Blade Runner 2099 one. Apple really killing it with sci-fi the past couple years.
Apple TV has been the new SciFi channel since it went online in 2020.
I pirate the entirety of the rest of my content, but keep an Apple TV subscription around just because I've liked probably around 90% of the shows and movies I've seen from them. There have only been a couple of shows that I've found boring.
They have great stuff from other genres besides sci-fi too.
They already fucked it up with the "Jonny Memotic" jack-in. In Neuromancer, it's trodes and a headband to jack in. I still have high hopes this will be a quasi-semi-accurate series.
History does not say this will happen. Gibson has been screwed often, as have others.
However, Foundation, while a solid and great sci-fi series, absoulutly analy fucks the Asimov books. When you compare Foundation to the novels, it's 100% shit! They could have done atompunk awesomeness! Instead, it's an emperor that is the LEAST important character in the first book.
If Neuromancer fucks the book, then fuck AppleTV and everyone involved.
Do not get me started on how shitty and almost enjoyable "Peripherable" was on Amazon. That went so far off book it hurt.
all 11 comments