all 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (5 children)

good! Now the next challenge will be flagging & executing these proposals.

If you come up with an automated system that's not going to provide such high accuracy, then if you rely on manpower alone that's also prone to fail - I think it's a gray area; What's next, a combination of both with human asked to approve on the flagged repos? perhaps

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    You can get high accuracy if you don't care about false negatives and only ban the most egregious shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    I guess if you can find the worst offenders you can ease server load, like if they make pushes around the clock too fast, that's one good signal.

    Like if you have 2000 pushes in a day (pushes, not commits) and it's clearly 24/7, that's probably an autoslopper.

    If someone is not doing that, who cares, the "agents directing agents" folks are the ones that cause the most problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Hm, I'm a heavy pusher. Tho, I don't believe I've gotten past 200 a day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Git is actually very efficient. You need to be very inefficient with your workflows to cause strain on a git server.

    The fact that you can just host a git server for free and most people don't need to ever worry about limits is a wonder.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Models are already trained so it's harder and harder to tell. They don't put emojis in code anymore, they don't even comment it. The new ones stopped doing the massive comment blocks that was so telling or signing their name somewhere at the top. It's going to be comoletely impossible to enforce in just a few months.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    I use sometimes AI for some research, so I asked an AI about vibe coding

    Simple question, do you trust an app coded by an AI from Google, Facebook, Musk and cia., even if it works?

    Yes, you can use an AI to code some routines, helping in your work, but way different to create and release an app with a simple prompt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    100% it will eventually be a problem, specifically the knowledge loss at the bottom. I just don't think banning generated code will work in two months.

    Look at where image gen is at, and it's way harder to make a real looking photo than to make something that looks like it's human coded. It's not feasible if you look at where the tech is going and how fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    ?? AlternativeTo and the article load perfectly and fast. Check your connections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Check your browser. Try again in a text browser or security hardened browser. It doesn't load.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Using a browser which can't open a community driven, well known, normal and secure Webpage, isn't security but masochism.

    Text browsers (Lynx, Links, etc.) are usefull for some tasks but for sure not for browsing in daily use, same with a excess of security and unneeded blockings in a browser, which break most websites. Better check unknown websites (Blacklight, WebbKoll, Mozilla Observatory, etc.), monitor the netactivity (Portmaster, PiHole) and block data which really can filter your identity, not the tecnical data which are the same for millions of other users and are needed to render properly a page.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago
    [+] -11 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Have you actually read their blog post about it? They're pretty reasonable about the enforcement of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The decision of Codeberg is due to its user votes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)