US Sen. Bernie Sanders recently commissioned a government analysis of federal aid programs and how much employees of some of the largest and most politically influential corporations in the country are relying on food and healthcare benefits due to the chronically low wages paid by Amazon, Walmart, and other firms.

On Wednesday, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office (GAO) released the results of its research, revealing trends that Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime critic of economic inequality and poverty wages and the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, called "beyond unacceptable."

Six years after the GAO first analyzed low-wage workers' use of Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the report found that the number of Amazon employees who required federal assistance has nearly tripled since 2020, despite the fact that the e-commerce giant has increased its annual profits from $11.59 billion to $77.67 billion in that time.

The analysis focused on 11 states—Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Nebraska, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Washington—whose combined populations comprise about one-fifth of the US population.

Last year, 12,346 of Amazon's employees needed SNAP assistance, for which households must earn less than 130% of the federal poverty level to qualify. A family of three would have to make around $35,000 or less to qualify for the program. Millions of people were shut out of the crucial program by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which required states to impose strict limits on eligibility.

More than 11,000 Amazon workers also relied on Medicaid last year in the states surveyed.

"Corporations underpay workers, don't provide healthcare, and outsource core worker needs to the government," said the labor-focused media organization More Perfect Union.

While Walmart topped the list of corporations whose employees used Medicaid benefits, as it did in 2020, its share of workers who rely on the two federal programs went up only slightly over the five-year period, while Amazon's share grew significantly.

Amazon spokesperson Rachael Lighty told The Washington Post—owned by billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos—that the company's hiring spree since the coronavirus pandemic contributed to its increased share of Medicaid and SNAP beneficiaries, and noted that Amazon offers "part-time options for those who want them," which makes more employees eligible for the benefits.

But the Post noted that many people who may want full-time employment and the higher wages it offers can only find part-time work. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has found an increase in part-time employment since the pandemic.

Sanders noted that Walmart increased its annual profits from $14.88 billion in 2020 to $21.89 billion in 2025, but the number of workers who relied on Medicaid grew by 55% to more than 16,000 people in the 11 states sampled by the GAO.

“American taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize the starvation wages of large corporations like Walmart and Amazon," said the senator. "These corporations are making record-breaking profits, paying their CEOs exorbitant compensation packages, and spending billions of dollars on stock buybacks to enrich their wealthy shareholders. It is beyond unacceptable that these corporations, owned by some of the wealthiest people on the planet, are receiving corporate welfare from the federal government."

Rideshare and delivery apps like Uber and DoorDash, which were not significantly featured in the GAO's 2020 report, are now the top employers of people who use SNAP benefits and are in the top three employers of workers on Medicaid.

Nicole Moore, president of Rideshare Drivers United, told the Post that gig workers across the country struggle to make ends meet with "absolutely precarious income."

The analysis comes a year after the passage of the OBBBA, which delivered $4.5 trillion in tax cuts to corporations and the rich and which Republican proponents said was partially focused on eliminating waste and fraud in government programs like Medicaid. The law includes work requirements for the program and is expected to slash $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade.

Republicans have intensified their fixation on "fraud" in social services in recent months after fraudulent payments were found in Minnesota's public programs.

Warren Gunnels, the minority staff director for the Senate HELP Committee, said the GAO analysis shows that "the problem isn't the single mom getting $6 a day in food stamps."

"The problem is Jeff Bezos, worth $269 billion, more than doubled his wealth since 2020 while paying wages so low the number of Amazon workers on food stamps and Medicaid nearly tripled," said Gunnels. "Bezos is the welfare queen."

Sanders called on Bezos and the Walton family, which owns Walmart, "to get off of welfare and pay their workers a living wage with good benefits."

"No one who works for a company making billions in profits should be living in poverty," said the senator. "This is especially true after these corporations and their multibillionaire owners received a massive tax break from President Trump’s so-called ‘Big, Beautiful Bill,’ paid for by the largest cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance in history.”


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
17 comments in c/workreform@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 48 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

Everyone complaining about their tax dollars paying for these programs seem to have no problem with their tax dollars subsidizing these companies' payrolls.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Minimum wage in the "richest country in the world" needs to be $25/hr without tips. Or is "richest country" always been a lie?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It can't be a number. These types will just raise prices so $25 is the new $15. Instead the gap needs to be a percentage including bonuses, stocks, health insurance coverage, ...and any other form of compensation. This would mean even business owners or s corp splitters, loan takers against investments, business worth, etc are all taxed fairly and evenly. It would also mean they can't artificial lower their income for tax reasons or for keeping bottom wages low. Additionally cost of living should be factored in such that the median or average value of goods is evaluated by a non biased third party that changes the undisclosed goods for calculating the CoL just so corporations cannot game this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Also it should be a federal law that companies have to match inflation in pay raises.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Let's not call it a raise, but rather an adjustment. A raise would imply you got something of greater value than you had. Inflation by definition means the value of what you had is now lower than it was.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Sounds something like what is proposed in the book, Ministry for the Future, create a law that no person can be compensated more than ten times what the lowest paid employee in that same company is compensated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    How on earth do they think these CEOs and Executives make their obscene salaries. It’s via wage theft and they’re all in on it, people are just to indoctrinated to speak out against it and do something about it, for fear of losing what crumbs of health insurance they are dealt with.

    Big companies have people well and truly under boot in most countries.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It is crazy how people can be against welfare programs because "the money has to come from somewhere" but in the same breath defend billionaires who's wealth also "has to come from somewhere".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Any employees qualifying for aid due to low wages while working at large companies like Walmart should disqualify the company from all tax incentives.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    It would not be legal in a society that is actually trying to have consistent laws. The US is not one of those.

    At this point businesses don't have to adhere to any regulations so long as they bribe the officials that are supposed to enforce them.

  • source
  • parent
  • Where do you thinks the money comes from for the executives mega yachts?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    According to our analysis of state-level data from September 2025, the employers who employed the most Medicaid enrollees or SNAP beneficiaries varied across the 11 states that provided data. However, 46 companies (about one-third of the total companies across all 11 states) were among the top 25 employers of Medicaid enrollees or SNAP beneficiaries in at least two states. Seventeen of these 46 companies were among the 50 largest Fortune 500 companies by number of employees.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    In Britain they call their version of this shit "Working Poor".

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago*

    It's okay. If I lose my jobs in California they'll pay me the same unemployment wage they paid out back in 2005.

    What a fucked up country this is.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago