Desperately trying to find a use-case for their inferior AI. I feel like their idea pool was always at absolute 0 but now it's going even below that.

Let's have MetaAI raise our kids everyone!

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
6 comments in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (1 child)

I don't understand. You could spend an entire lifetime reading existing bedtime stories from your local library. There's absolutely no reason to demolish the planet and the economy in pursuit of some sort of shitty replacement.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Some of my best memories with my daughter is reading bedtime stories and making them up when she wanted something particular.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    exposing small children to AI-generated things? I seriously wonder about the effects of that on their brains...

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Some things don't need AI at all.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    This has the same energy as playing music for deaf people and painting pictures for blind people

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 29 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    My daughter and I love going to the library and picking out books to read before bed. I can't imagine trying to replace that with a soulless LLM.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    But think of all the time you’ll save!

    Instead of spending useless time bonding over the shared experience of going to the library - a publicly funded entity that is the only place in current society where you can just exist without buying things - and then the tedious time spent talking about and choosing books together, you can now have an AI care for everything. You can even use their AI to voice the story for you to remove the need to interact with your child at all!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    So it's for Mark.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    Just give the corporate surveillance state your children. It's inevitable barring resistance.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not going to knock this. I'm a pretty quiet guy and my imagination sucks. I just focus on what I need to do next. I did read to my daughter but I can't make shit up on the fly and I don't do voices

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/Aii@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Obviously don’t trust Meta to deliver content to a child, but how is this different than other forms of media that kids are already ingesting on TV, or phones or tablets?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Because LLMs are really bad at telling stories.

    ...Look, I'm an advocate for LLMs here. I was using 6B models to mess around with roleplaying and storywriting in like 2022, with GPT-J finetunes. But that's with human guidance, using it as a tool or "sounding board."

    They're fascinating writing aids.

    But by themself, unattended, off-the-shelf LLMs have a horrendous architecture for writing long form stories, basically. They go off the rails at the drop of a hat, and cannot self correct. They lose track of the longer context, and write things that don't make sense. They have weird, very inhuman patterns of using the same character names and ideas, or mimicking prose from earlier in the context where it's not applicable at all. Their prose is terrible in an eerie, repetitive way.

    So for children, there's a risk of:

    • Not-safe-for-family content popping up literally randomly, in the middle of the story, which a parent might miss skimming.

    • Weird, nonsensical storylines I would classify as "brainrot"

    • Very repetitive themes and ideas, basically a lack of variety.

    • Instilling strange linguistic habits.

    • Emotions and tone that don't line up with the content, especially when TTS is used (as most TTS models aren't tightly integrated into the main LLM; they're tiny, dumb models reading a script blind, with no context).


    ...Have you seen any horror movies where something is supposed to be human, or acting like it, but it isn't quite right? Because it clearly doesn't understand, its just mimicking?

    That's the risk here, one you wouldn't get even with TikTok doomscrolling. And that's the best case scenario, without even getting into influence ops, engagement maximization techniques, or enshittification Meta is notorious for.

    Researchers have built finetunes with frameworks to try and improve autonomous LLM writing, but as someone who's followed their research, I can tell you there's a zero percent chance Meta implemented it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I still don’t see the big difference here between this and letting kids watch YouTube, especially with so much AI content anyways. And I’ve read some really bad kids stories that were supposedly written by people.

    At the end of the day it’s just another thing for parents to parent on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Back when I was at the bedtime story stage I just went for the books I enjoyed as a kid. We got though the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings, some of the Narnia books and some others. Even if they don't know all the words that's ok the best stories just carry you along. The youngest should be on picture books not screens but the main thing is, you are there and reading with them because that time is priceless.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Technology, solving problems nobody had.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [+] -6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Personally, i think there is a use case. I didnt check out meta ai but its fairly easy to generate good bedtime stories. And yes, parents, after 9hrs work, 3hrs commute, several more hours childcare dont have any imagination left.

    Looking at the books out there, even the famous gruffelo writers, most of these books are dull story wise. The translations often lacking. The paintings are nice tho. I like the books most that have a funny singing part.

    Stories is something AI excells at.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    If you can't find good children's books you're not looking properly. Ask other parents, ask teachers, ask library staff etc. Just like anything most of it is bad, but there's also real gems and you don't need hundreds of original stories to entertain a kid, just a few really good ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Even if a story is a bit dull, it's much better written by a human than an AI. Humans have intent. AI just has a big black box trained on scraped data being churned by a datacenter. Even the dullest stories written by a human can at least have some character into them. AI couldn't even come close to someone's first draft of their first work.

    Also if AI truly does excel at stories, name a few best-selling books that critics love that's written by AI (bonus points if it's not someone's scraped work).

    But hey if you like mediocre manufactured soulless slop whipped out by the thousands, you do you.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    ...and then, the Zuck Knight killed the Privacy Dragon and married the Princess of Gold Kingdom.

    The End.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago

    Isn't the entire point of a bedtime story to turn off your brain? Shit journalism

  • source