Janine Jackson: The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 addressed the rights of people with disabilities in their interactions with the federal government, including entities that receive certain federal contracts. Section 504 of that act prohibits organizations and employers from excluding or denying individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to receive program benefits and services.

Source


From Truthout via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
6 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

I recommend anyone who hasn't to read the posts of some anti-psychiatry and disability rights activists on, say, Tumblr (if they can stomach it). The USA has always been inhumane to folks with disabilities. There was significant abuse well before the re-election of Trump.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Greg Abbott is the only acceptable casualty of this.

    So of course he'll get to bypass it all anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Let's maybe not borrow Fox News's habit to describe everything as a war on everything

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago

    I think there's a substantial difference between the imaginary aggression towards, say, Christmas and the intentional, targeted, and systemicly induced destabilization and attempted eradication of disabled, trans, and poor people by this administration.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago

    WAR WAR WAR

    SLAM SLAM SLAM

  • source
  • 5 comments in c/FuckTheUSA@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Just a reminder that the disabled were the first group the Nazis targeted with a euthanasia program, in 1936.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I'm not sure if Nazis targeted all disabled people, or was it more of a class war similar to what we're seeing now. When they described senators with disabilities voting against disability supoorts, it felt very clear to me that the senator is able to afford private support and likely doesn't consider themself disabled the same way as the rest of us. They can add "willful blindness" to their ailments.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    Eugenics in America

    As Margaret Sanger said, “Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is extreme cruelty…there is no greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.” She spoke of the burden of caring for “this dead weight of human waste.” Such views were widely shared. H.G. Wells spoke against “ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens.” Theodore Roosevelt said that “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind.” Luther Burbank: “Stop permitting criminals and weaklings to reproduce.” George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind.

    There was overt racism in this movement, exemplified by texts such as The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy, by American author Lothrop Stoddard. But, at the time, racism was considered an unremarkable aspect of the effort to attain a marvelous goal -the improvement of humankind in the future. It was this avant-garde notion that attracted the most liberal and progressive minds of a generation. California was one of twenty-nine American states to pass laws allowing sterilization, but it proved the most forward-looking and enthusiastic -more sterilizations were carried out in California than anywhere else in America.

    Eugenics research was funded by the Carnegie Foundation, and later by the Rockefeller Foundation. The latter was so enthusiastic that even after the center of the eugenics effort moved to Germany, and involved the gassing of individuals from mental institutions, the Rockefeller Foundation continued to finance German researchers at a very high level. (The foundation was quiet about it, but they were still funding research in 1939, only months before the onset of World War II.)

    America's eugenics supporters included Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill. It was approved by Supreme Court justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis, who ruled in its favor.The famous who supported it included Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone; activist Margaret Sanger; botanist Luther Burbank; Leland Stanford, founder of Stanford University; the novelist H.G. Wells; the playwright George Bernard Shaw; and hundreds of others. Nobel Prize winners gave support. Research was backed by the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations. The Cold Springs Harbor Institute was built to carry out this research, but important work was also done at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, and Johns Hopkins. Legislation to address this crisis was passed in states from New York to California

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I'm so scared for my kid

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Reminds me of a certain regime during world war 2

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/usa@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    We need the youth to have better aim cough bitions and to stay in school

  • source