all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Wow! The country attacked and constantly bombarded by another country, had the audacity to destroy the installation built by the aggressor!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Are you insane? Iran was just attacked by the US, and the US has a finger in every country in the world. I wonder if that means that it's now legitimate for Iranian military officers to blow up infrastructure in your country connected to Americans, you know, "built by the aggressor" in your words. I somehow doubt you'd have the same cavalier attitude about that. Defending straight up terrorism in third countries now smfh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    This attack happened in international waters iirc. If Iran had attacked e.g. internet cables on the ocean floor connecting the US to Europe or Japan or wherever, that'd definitely be a valid target.

    Russia directly finances its war against Ukraine with the proceeds from that pipeline. Of course it's a valid target. A problem for Germany, sure, but that's a lesson in not becoming dependent on states like Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    Nord stream ordered by Germany to avoid having to support Ukraine when they got invaded

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Everyone in Germany must be thankful that the gas prices keep increasing.

  • source