no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
10 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
[–] 46 points 4 months ago (4 children)

first off - how is cambridge analytica still a thing in 2026?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    [..] PuffPal, a platform that manages membership and age verification for cannabis retailers and clubs across Europe.

    Get ready for many more leaks, as governments require identity and age verification everywhere online.

    Many organisations, which cannot be trusted with this data, are going to be processing it.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    The comments on combinator:

    I have a real problem with the pretense posed by the article that the club has no blame. They should have understood the risk they were taking on by subcontracting a vendor to collect passports, and better vetted that vendor. Obviously the service provider was completely inept, but that doesn't absolve the fools using them. I preach to my clients this sort of PII should be treated as a toxic, hazardous substance. Ideally don't touch it with a 10 foot pole, and if you can't help it then limit the scope, protect it with strong access policies that severely limit who can touch it (including encryption keys conservatively custodied), and securely delete it all as soon as possible.

    Too many companies these days point you to shoddy third parties for some kind of functionality (e.g. book an appointment, perform KYC on you, host the online learning platform for your course, etc.), inappropriately foisting both a new business relationship on you that you never asked for along with their partner's terms of service that you have no bargaining power in negotiating.

    This is a side-effect of the SaaS era, and the model is broken.

    jwr 9 days ago | parent | next [–]

    If these kinds of breaches were actually costly, then people would indeed treat PII as toxic. But they aren't. The media brouhaha blows over within a week or so, and things are fine again. Leaking PII should be very, very expensive, and then this idiocy would stop.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Has the link gone down? I get error when trying to access

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    "Oops, welp, better get a new one with a stupid scowling Trump on it!"

    -- Idiot Administration probably

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/privacy@programming.dev view that post
    [–] 31 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    This is basically what happened here in Sweden, when millions of phone call recordings to our national medical help line, were found to be accessible on the internet because, and I quote the company responsible:

    "Someone plugged the internet cord into the hard drive"

    But they claimed that the dammage was minimal because, and I again quote from the company responsible:

    "You would need to perform a command movement to slip in through the back way"

    Which the company claimed would be impossible for a normal person.

    In truth, you would just need to enter the correct URL, and then get access.

    Both of these expressions were instantly made part of the Swedish IT lexicon as insanely funny and incompetent expressions.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Who the fuck says that? It feels straight out of a network TV show felrom the 00s.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    They really chose the domain 'Cambridge Analytica', named after the Facebook scandal?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Is this not the exact same Cambridge Analytica? Wikipedia seems to say this is their domain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Their legal notice https://cambridgeanalytica.org/legal-notice/ says

    The website cambridgeanalytica.org is published by Vortexlab Digital Marketing, a digital media and research-oriented publishing company headquartered in:

    Dubai Silicon Oasis, DDP, Building A1
    Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    So it seems like they're a separate thing, but it's confusing.

    Wikipedia says:

    (Cambidge Analytica) closed operations in 2018 due to backlash from the data scandal

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Age verification laws are being suggested with absolutely no manner of remediation. If your details ate exposed because of crap like this, you will bear the brunt of the damage.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    That is terrifying. Definitely makes you want to pull back and figure out how to limit your digital footprint.

  • source