Alright, I watched parts of the first video. The creator adds nothing new to the discussion, just presents evidence that was already public. She just plays parts of AH testimony and treats them as facts. I turned it off when she claimed JDs finger tip couldn't have been severed by a glass bottle, because the injury resembled a crushing wound and not a slicing wound, so JD was obviously lying. Ignoring the fact that, according to his testimony, the finger got crushed between the thrown bottle and the counter top. It shows that she's either misinformed or twisting the truth to fit her narrative.

Anyway, I'm not going through the rest of them. I came to the conclusion that AH is a terrible person by watching the trial. The jury did as well.