you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What people don't understand, I think, about the pro-Palestine issue is that it's a litmus test for folks. If you can brave and stand up against this genocide, then we can trust you on a variety of different issues. And Zoran didn't win in spite of his pro-Palestine position. He won a majority of Jewish voters because of it.

source, min 5:30

Gavin Newsom is a distraction. There won’t be any more elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    And so the gerrymandering would lead to further genocide? I believe you may be conflating two G words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, of course no. But the gerrymandering laws are related to elections. Trump has been, for a long time, clear about it. There won’t be any more elections. He is a dictator.

    Gavin Newsom knows this, like every Democrat, this is not about elections or gerrymandering or talking though to Trump. This is a distraction from Epstein and Gaza.

    This is my opinion. If it was a smear campaign, as you can see, I failed spectacularly. Do you think I can smear Gavin from lemmy? Who is being smeared here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think for some reason you're putting the fascist cart before the horse, and it strikes me as incredibly unnecessary just yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • I know, it seems too soon to judge and unnecessarily discriminatory towards any Dem running. I get the sentiment… but these last few years taught me to always consider worst case scenario.

    did you see who the AIPAC funds? It’s basically the whole us political class, all of them. I need to draw a true red line.

  • source
  • parent