58
No more Blocktoberfest? German court throws book at ad blockers (www.theregister.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/technology@piefed.social
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

You are aware that not every site confirms to your use case, right?

I'm not even arguing in support of ads; I use ad blockers everywhere I can. I'm just saying that sites that use ads to support their costs aren't free like the top level comment said.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    I'm aware of many things, in this case I just don't care. They can stop hosting or stop me from viewing their site.
    If asked to go, I'll go immediately. It is common for sites to ask me to disable ad blocking, I won't so I leave.
    If it isn't free then block me from viewing. I'll stay on the free internet just fine.
    I never agreed sharing costs and will never do so in the case of ads.
    They decided to host, I wasn't contacted to help share the cost of hosting nor ever agreed to ads.
    They can leave the internet for all I care, it's full anyway.

    Have you ever asked why don't they just put these sites behind a password, user sign in or other blocking methods?
    The capability exists in most web servers. Why won't they do it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent