784
Anon is Bri’ish (lemmy.today)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
165 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The one where I don't have to upload my I.D. to watch porn, BABY! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sometimes I forget how much freedoms we have in Washington State. The only thing is strict gun laws, but it's mostly background checks and limited magazine sizes

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Limited mag sizes are a legit issue, but NICs checks are federal.

    The only thing limited mags are effective against is the possibility to have more rounds in a home defense situation (which is really only a problem if there are multiple invaders, but of course there usually are, that's not usually a solo activity).

    Their stated objective (to reduce the amount of rnds/mag so mass shooters are less effective) is complete hogwash, magazines can be changed in one literal second, and sometimes the shooters even prefer the 10-20rnd mags because the standard 30s are harder to hide. Changing mags is only a problem when someone is returning fire, if you're completely unimpeded you might as well have a damn lever action.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    And it's not like mass shooters are law abiding citizens except in the small area of murdering random people.... They can easily drive one state over to Idaho and get whatever they want, and if they're out, continue south to Utah or east to Montana. Nobody is going to check your car on the way back...

    I grew up in WA, and everyone got around whatever law they didn't like. Want to blow up big fireworks but your town doesn't allow it? Go to the local res, hide them under a blanket in the car, and be a very law abiding citizen on the way home (and blow them up in a random neighborhood). Before weed was legal, people would just grow it in the forest on public land, which was literally everywhere.

    The mag law just exists to piss off law abiding citizens and is the same "save the children" BS excuse that'd being used to effectively ban porn and other things across the country. Solve the problem another way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tbh you don't even have to drive, you can 3d print standard capacity magazines and then use a spring, which you can buy in any state, or cannibalize one from another mag (certain mags that can be legally bought in restricted states work too, but a man has to keep some secrets).

    But also yeah driving works too, and plenty people have done it.

    I grew up elsewhere, but have similar experiences regarding weed, fireworks, and more. Laws don't stop people from doing anything they're significantly intent on doing in my experience.

    Totally agree, and I extend that to all the pointless feature bans. Their true purpose is for politicians to posture for reelection lol, same with the anti-porn bullshit, just different politicians.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Their true purpose is for politicians to posture for reelection lol, same with the anti-porn bullshit, just different politicians.

    Exactly.

    If a criminal wants something, they can get it whether there's a ban or not. Actual solutions here are much more difficult than a ban, hence why politicians love bans so much.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent