PC Gaming

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

15,889 readers

5,866 active

1,051 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Meta's AI rules permitted 'sensual' chats with kids until a journalist got ahold of the document and asked what was up with that (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

The sad thing is I'm not even surprised that Meta has that stance. A few years back, people were up in arms claiming there was a bunch of CSAM on Pornhub despite the site having robust systems to prevent it. Meanwhile there was orders of magnitude more CSAM on Facebook and Twitter that was ignored

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Perception is key. People expect objectionable content where it already exists. To them this is only a matter of scale. "Facebook" is "family oriented" and as such couldn't possibly have that.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent