▲ 168 ▼ Meta's AI rules permitted 'sensual' chats with kids until a journalist got ahold of the document and asked what was up with that (www.pcgamer.com) submitted 1 year ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 23 points 1 year ago (3 children) Meta: It's okay to sexualize 14 year olds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) The sad thing is I'm not even surprised that Meta has that stance. A few years back, people were up in arms claiming there was a bunch of CSAM on Pornhub despite the site having robust systems to prevent it. Meanwhile there was orders of magnitude more CSAM on Facebook and Twitter that was ignored permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Perception is key. People expect objectionable content where it already exists. To them this is only a matter of scale. "Facebook" is "family oriented" and as such couldn't possibly have that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) 13 is even okay *to them, not even in high school yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) The sad thing is I'm not even surprised that Meta has that stance. A few years back, people were up in arms claiming there was a bunch of CSAM on Pornhub despite the site having robust systems to prevent it. Meanwhile there was orders of magnitude more CSAM on Facebook and Twitter that was ignored permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Perception is key. People expect objectionable content where it already exists. To them this is only a matter of scale. "Facebook" is "family oriented" and as such couldn't possibly have that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago Perception is key. People expect objectionable content where it already exists. To them this is only a matter of scale. "Facebook" is "family oriented" and as such couldn't possibly have that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) 13 is even okay *to them, not even in high school yet. permalink fedilink source parent