You completely missed the point of what I was saying and misconstrued it entirely. I never said they were contradictory, I said that the second line makes it seem like the first line is just what she tells people so she sounds normal, and the second line reveals her true intentions.

Also, nothing implies trust in this scene, only that he told her that he plans to eat her, and she Assumed that meant she would get sexual gratification out of it, which he denied.

Yeah she seems like she'd consent to him going downtown, which is entirely different from the first panel due to the consent. Consent is key.