So a 50 year old law that probably had nothing to do with the affects on the environment at the time are what you’re gonna hold onto here?
We know better now, that’s why most sane places have changed their laws in the 50 fucking years since.
Don’t you think it’s time to look back and change it, and maybe this lady wouldn’t be trying to hold another animal responsible when they cause more issues?
Dogs are allowed to be off leash, so why is this situation flipped? If a cat can roam free an cause public property damage with no repercussions, why should dogs be held to a higher standard? Pleas I would love to hear why one’s okay, but not the other way.