you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (79 children)

What's the best Linux distro for an easy switch from Windows?

Thank you everyone!! My PC is being left behind by Windows 11.

  • source
  • hideshow 79 child comments
  • [+] 33 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Mint is very user-friendly, and can utilize all the handy apps that are packaged for Ubuntu. I don't really enjoy the default interface of Ubuntu (it feels like a mobile OS in a lot of ways). Mint really does a good job of stripping that down and recreating a basic windows-like experience., while taking advantage of all the compatibility and software support that Ubuntu has.

  • source
  • parent
  • Mint is great for older hardware performance wise. It's also one of the most polished distros in terms of things like updates, settings and updates. The Ubuntu/Debian ecosystem is also better supported by 3rd parties than Arch and Red Hat.

    Elementary is a lot of the same, but the UI is more for Mac refugees.

    It is lagging a bit on the latest gaming support. Thats what bazzite(Fredora) and CachyOS(Arch) are doing very well at the moment. They are a bit heavier on hardware requirements though, but still less than Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    isn't it an issue with flatpaks requiring some permissions that aren't enabled by default

    You should try using Flatseal https://github.com/tchx84/Flatseal to check the permissions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I have. I have given them more and more permissions but they can never connect to the saned service and I haven't been able to find a single shred of documentation about it from any atomic distro and my discord messages were ignored. There are a few posts asking about it for various atomic distro but it is very much "it works for me shrug" or "it doesn't work at all so I had to layer the scanner app" with 0 mention in anything about the correct flatpak permissions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    +1 to Mint. It is a very easy transition & you will not have ragerts.

    Pros:

    1. prettier than windows while having a similar interface

    2. more responsive than windows

    3. more stable than windows

    4. zero spyware/bloatware

    5. basically the same level of software compatibility as windows

    Only things that take some research ahead of time or getting used to imo:

    1. deciding how you want to partition your drives during installation (you can let it automatically do this, but there are reasons to create a different partition structure across drives/have different sized partitions),

    2. mounting drives. There are GUI tools for this (file explorer for mounting, gparted for formatting), so it really isn't a big deal, but it is a little more difficult than with Windows and you may need to reformat your drives depending what file format they're currently in.

    3. make sure your motherboard/video card/cpu all work well with linux. They should, but just check first.

    4. note that games requiring kernel level anticheat (aka spyware) won't work. So if that's a deal breaker, then dual boot or don't switch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    +1 mint

    I also have a bit higher FPS in some games (both proton and native) but some just don't run at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    +1 for Mint as a gateway drug.

    I started on Mint back in October. My server is still running Mint, because I can't be arsed with setting everything up on another distro, but my work machine is on KDE Neon. And that isn't safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I have 2 monitors at different resolutions, works fine and my desktop/icon theme/etc is very pretty imo. I do agree that mint out of the box is maybe equally/sliiiightly less pretty than windows - but as soon as you change the shitty default wallpaper it is prettier imo.

    That is true about Adobe products. But fuck adobe. And if you need Adobe, then just dual boot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure I understand for Linux Mint is tied to the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

    Linux Mint isn't affiliated with Microsoft. (Not even a little)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    it's not about linux mint, it's about its base, Ubuntu which also isn't involved with microsoft, but its parent company, canonical is guilty of providing similar aid as ms does. so if you're boycotting microsoft, you should boycott canonical, too. thus, LMDE being my recommendation in that case. LMDE is developed by the same people who make Mint. i was never trying to imply they're the proplem

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    That makes more sense

    Thanks for the explanation. I personally don't see Linux Mint as supporting Ubuntu since they are independent and not financially tied but I think that comes down to personal choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If all you do is use a browser and game then bazzite is solid.

    If you do more stuff then fedora might be the way to go.

    I started with popos but since its more on a stable ideology updates to stuff take much longer which is why I started looking around to try all the lingo I've heard about on Lemmy like KDE Wayland immutable atomic etc etc

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I switched 10 years ago, started on Ubuntu and hated it, switched to ZorinOS and gained understanding, then switched to Mint and found a home. I now recommend Mint to all windows refugees, it's layed out similar enough to be intuitive and let's you learn Linux at a comfortable pace.

    Tl;Dr - switch to Linux Mint when leaving windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    That question is like asking which superhero is the strongest in a comic shop. There is an answer, but some people have made their own opinion part of their identity, and are extremely passionate emotional about it.

    It's Linux Mint, by far. Others like Fedora and Pop are solid choices, and things like Arch, Bazzite, or CachyOS have their merits, but Mint offers by far the most uncomplicated, entry-level experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Some time ago I answered this question on a post that seems have been deleted but got some good feedback:

    The most important decision as a new Linux user is the desktop environment, the most similar desktop environment to the Windows desktop are KDE Plasma and Cinnamon. This means your best options are:

    • Linux Mint (Cinnamon): They are the creators of the Cinnamon desktop environment and will be the default on installation.
    • Kubuntu (KDE Plasma): This is Ubuntu's official KDE Plasma flavour, it comes with everything as usual just different desktop.
    • Fedora (KDE Edition): Same story as Ubuntu here, only that with Fedora's own packages and environment.

    First I would check if the hardware is compatible (99% of the time is). Then I would check what software you need and/or want and check if it is available at these distros, and get familiar on how to install the software packages (either with their respective app stores or in the command line).

    There is a lot to learn but with these distros you can just install, forget and simply keep using them for eternity.

    The last and more important tip I have is to not to worry about the sea of options out there, you will not be missing anything huge by picking one or the other. Which is how most of new users feel (I did in my time).

    Hope you have a great Linux journey mate!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    If you want something that barely ever changes and works today as its gonna work 5 years from now, then Mint. If you want constant compatibility with the shiniest new stuff, then an atomic fedora distro (Bazzite for gaming, aurora/bluefin for general purpose).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (21 children)
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (20 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 6 points 1 year ago (14 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Hello! Random person coming in. I'm a New Linux convert. Have used Mint and its great, works well. Much to learn but I feel like I got this. Tried out Fedora recently, and while I'm getting things to work. if feels like I made a mistake, like it doesn't feel as good to solve my problems on Fedora as it does something like Mint. I'm still learning, yes, but from a new Linux convert, Fedora does not feel as good to use and learn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Another random chiming in, been a Linux user for 10 years, and a couple years ago, I gave Fedora a good go for a month and couldn't get it either.

    I'm sure if I committed more time to it I would have understood it, but I needed a working computer and not one I was fighting with half the time, so I cut it there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • My experience has been the opposite. Besides Debian which I use for headless machines instead of graphical ones, Fedora is my go-to JustWorksℒ️ distro for graphical computers that I need to be reliable and know I'll never need to worry about or fuss with. For my computer that I don't need reliability and don't mind messing around on, I use Gentoo.

    I think all this highlights is the how great it is to have many distros to choose from that fit different user's needs and different use cases. Obviously we are using the systems in different ways from each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not really sure what you mean by this, since the only major difference is the package manager or choice of desktop environment. Do you just prefer apt over dnf/yum? That's fine, you do you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)