▲ 546 ▼ Microsoft no longer permits local Windows 10 accounts if you want Consumer Extended Security Updates — support beyond EOL requires a Microsoft Account link-up even if you pay $30 (www.tomshardware.com) submitted 1 year ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world 220 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago (4 children) Windows 11 is hardly an upgrade. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) If they still insist on shoving recall down our throats I refuse to downgrade to 11. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have windows 11 and I don't have recall enabled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I remain very skeptical about this. It would not surprise me in the least to find out that "disabling" Recall only disables the user-facing aspects of it, but that the data collection still happens in the background regardless. I have no proof of this, it is pure speculation, but it would be in line with behavior Microsoft has demonstrated before when adding new "features". Would anyone like to play Bejeweled? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago You would kinda notice the disk usage. Last I saw it was quite image heavy and could use a fair amount if you had a lot of activity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago (3 children) If they still insist on shoving recall down our throats I refuse to downgrade to 11. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have windows 11 and I don't have recall enabled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I remain very skeptical about this. It would not surprise me in the least to find out that "disabling" Recall only disables the user-facing aspects of it, but that the data collection still happens in the background regardless. I have no proof of this, it is pure speculation, but it would be in line with behavior Microsoft has demonstrated before when adding new "features". Would anyone like to play Bejeweled? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago You would kinda notice the disk usage. Last I saw it was quite image heavy and could use a fair amount if you had a lot of activity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children) I have windows 11 and I don't have recall enabled. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I remain very skeptical about this. It would not surprise me in the least to find out that "disabling" Recall only disables the user-facing aspects of it, but that the data collection still happens in the background regardless. I have no proof of this, it is pure speculation, but it would be in line with behavior Microsoft has demonstrated before when adding new "features". Would anyone like to play Bejeweled? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago You would kinda notice the disk usage. Last I saw it was quite image heavy and could use a fair amount if you had a lot of activity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child) I remain very skeptical about this. It would not surprise me in the least to find out that "disabling" Recall only disables the user-facing aspects of it, but that the data collection still happens in the background regardless. I have no proof of this, it is pure speculation, but it would be in line with behavior Microsoft has demonstrated before when adding new "features". Would anyone like to play Bejeweled? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago You would kinda notice the disk usage. Last I saw it was quite image heavy and could use a fair amount if you had a lot of activity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago You would kinda notice the disk usage. Last I saw it was quite image heavy and could use a fair amount if you had a lot of activity. permalink fedilink source parent