you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Russian media rarely if ever cites their sources, and when they do they are dubious at best

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Did they report on those at all?

    I searched their websites and I got 0 hits on the Ghost of Kyiv, and 1 hit on Snake Island (this).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There is no such thing as "neutral" in a war, but facts are facts, and lies are lies. If the position people take means people say lies, you disprove the lies.

    From all this word-soup I see that you have effectively not a good example of false reporting from the Kyiv Independent, and you cast a wide net to the whole "western media".

    What is an example of neutral media in your opinion that you consider factual and trustworthy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    What a sad, almost patethic, way to drop the towel and abandon the conversation.

    I can't say I am entirely surprised, when someone calls a newspaper a rag, accuses it of false reporting on two topics and then backpedals on "no, not that specifically, the whole western media is not neutral" (great discovery, newspapers are not neutral).

    Have a good one!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)