you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Unfortunately, it's not better and also shows slop

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can at least turn off its built-in summaries. But some filtering to detect AI generated articles would be nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You can ask it to turn off the summaries. It still shows them but you can ask.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    You know what I was thinking about the big summary at the top and completely forgot about the summaries in the result descriptions. But I'm not sure if that's DDG doing it, Bing (who they use as a backend), or the sites itself since I only see it on results from reddit and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for over a decade, the results are fine, and !bangs are extremely useful for piping queries directly to specific sites, !w for wikipedia, !aw for archwiki, etc. The Duck.ai function is a recent addition, and it can be easily disabled if you don’t want it. By default it doesn’t usually pop up by itself. You can also use lite.duckduckgo.com for a much leaner search and absolutely no AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was trying to use it for a long time, but the results are never fine for me. The situation when I search for something specific, the duck shows me nothing, and the google shows me exactly what I need is far too often for me to completely switch.
    Granted, I don't keep cookies, I use all the adblocks possible, and I disabled google's LLM bullshit, otherwise google is borderline unusable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments