▲ 880 ▼ Apple CEO Tim Cook gives 24-karat gold gift to Donald Trump (litter.catbox.moe) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 308 comments fedilink hide all child comments Imagine prostrating yourself to Trump in this embarrassing way. Sheesh.
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 129 points 1 year ago (21 children) we're gonna need more luigis. permalink fedilink source hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children) I understood this reference! Probably because I, too, am a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) i loved that show. ended so dark permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Worst part was we all knew the ending but didn’t see it coming permalink fedilink source parent [–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I've only seen a fraction. Did it end with a global environmental catastrophe? That was ignored because of profit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago giant meteor permalink fedilink source parent [–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ready player 2! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply) [+] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (12 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Whoa whoa there, slow down. You're talking crazy. Let's be reasonable. The only way to get any sort of reliable data is to let BOTH camps go nuts and see which one gets more attention and results. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Wasting effort and resources on either will bring less results. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Because the CEOs will biy the new people. Better to off both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children) Republicans don't have the spine to run at risk of death, and elections only happen every two years meaning until then DNC would have the first real supermajority since 1979. Tax them into the dirt, then there will never be more billionaires. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Do you think neoliberals would do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) Do you think liberal is an insult? Oh, I'm so sorry that promoting human rights inconveniences you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago You do know that they will buy more? Legislators are a dime a dozen for oligarchs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children) I understood this reference! Probably because I, too, am a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) i loved that show. ended so dark permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Worst part was we all knew the ending but didn’t see it coming permalink fedilink source parent [–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I've only seen a fraction. Did it end with a global environmental catastrophe? That was ignored because of profit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago giant meteor permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children) I understood this reference! Probably because I, too, am a dinosaur. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) i loved that show. ended so dark permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Worst part was we all knew the ending but didn’t see it coming permalink fedilink source parent [–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I've only seen a fraction. Did it end with a global environmental catastrophe? That was ignored because of profit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago giant meteor permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children) i loved that show. ended so dark permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Worst part was we all knew the ending but didn’t see it coming permalink fedilink source parent [–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I've only seen a fraction. Did it end with a global environmental catastrophe? That was ignored because of profit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago giant meteor permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kellenved@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Worst part was we all knew the ending but didn’t see it coming permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Prime@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I've only seen a fraction. Did it end with a global environmental catastrophe? That was ignored because of profit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago giant meteor permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ready player 2! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment load more comments (1 reply)
[+] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (12 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Whoa whoa there, slow down. You're talking crazy. Let's be reasonable. The only way to get any sort of reliable data is to let BOTH camps go nuts and see which one gets more attention and results. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Wasting effort and resources on either will bring less results. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Because the CEOs will biy the new people. Better to off both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children) Republicans don't have the spine to run at risk of death, and elections only happen every two years meaning until then DNC would have the first real supermajority since 1979. Tax them into the dirt, then there will never be more billionaires. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Do you think neoliberals would do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) Do you think liberal is an insult? Oh, I'm so sorry that promoting human rights inconveniences you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago You do know that they will buy more? Legislators are a dime a dozen for oligarchs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zink@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 child) Whoa whoa there, slow down. You're talking crazy. Let's be reasonable. The only way to get any sort of reliable data is to let BOTH camps go nuts and see which one gets more attention and results. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Wasting effort and resources on either will bring less results. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Wasting effort and resources on either will bring less results. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (8 children) Because the CEOs will biy the new people. Better to off both. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children) Republicans don't have the spine to run at risk of death, and elections only happen every two years meaning until then DNC would have the first real supermajority since 1979. Tax them into the dirt, then there will never be more billionaires. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Do you think neoliberals would do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) Do you think liberal is an insult? Oh, I'm so sorry that promoting human rights inconveniences you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* (7 children) Republicans don't have the spine to run at risk of death, and elections only happen every two years meaning until then DNC would have the first real supermajority since 1979. Tax them into the dirt, then there will never be more billionaires. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Do you think neoliberals would do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) Do you think liberal is an insult? Oh, I'm so sorry that promoting human rights inconveniences you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (6 children) Do you think neoliberals would do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) Do you think liberal is an insult? Oh, I'm so sorry that promoting human rights inconveniences you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (5 children) Do you think liberal is an insult? Oh, I'm so sorry that promoting human rights inconveniences you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) You're misunderstanding. I said neoliberal for a reason. I wouldn't call either party liberal, and the issue I have is labeling them as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) Right okay, the parties fighting for liberty, fairness, and true democracy aren't liberals they're "neoliberal". Whatever that means. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] degen@midwest.social 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) Neoliberalism fights for a semblance of democracy that favors economic, corporate freedom over personal liberties and the inherent human value we both care about. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Wouldn't that just be anarchism / corporatism similar to a deregulated syndicalism? Why use a word with an opposite meaning, "new liberalism", to describe something? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] degen@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago I'd guess it's to point out the fact that it's developed under the guise of social liberty, but it isn't a well defined term. Conservatives and neoliberals alike regard the views as liberal in America for some reason. In my mind the word helps distinguish it from liberal ideology by tacking on a modifier that can't be equated to liberalism per se. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago You do know that they will buy more? Legislators are a dime a dozen for oligarchs. permalink fedilink source parent