210
When Trump was 43, he dated 19 year-old tennis star Gabriela Sabatini, ex employee says he almost got in trouble bringing under 21 girls to his casino (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/when-trump-was-43-he-dated-19-year-old-tennis-star-gabriela-sabatini-ex-employee-says-he-almost-got-in-trouble-bringing-under-21-girls-to-his-casino.5945122/

https://xcancel.com/occupydemocrats/status/1950612578272686101?s=46

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I think the connection is he was most likely doing this with younger girls also. This one was just public.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    That’s what I do not understand. There is no correlation between dating 19 y/o and being a pedo, at least from the psychological point of view.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    There is plenty of other evidence, this alone doesn't mean much. All combined you begin to see the picture. Lies, underage girls, pics, the cloak and dagger bullshit, gislaine, "suicide".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh I fully agree. I also know that this in general is a big issue with men, or else Epstein’s club would never have been successful. The difference between men and people like Trump/Epstein is, that you usually develop morals at some point. Maybe there is a correlation between “successful businessmen” (aka. Con-men) and having no morals.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That sounds like something you just made up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It is easy to assume, isn’t it? It was not possible for you to look up the terms:

    • Pedophilia,
    • Hebephilia,
    • Ephebophilia, and
    • Nepiophilia,

    right? It is so so hard to actually look up some things before you form and opinion, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, looking up terms does not give you insight into correlation or lack thereof. Who told you there’s no correlation?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    That’s the very reason you classify and name it differently, because there is no obvious and clear correlation. If all people who are into 16 y/o would also be into 2 y/o, there would only be one term describing the condition.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Different classifications can have strong correlation. Casual observation isn’t going to cut it here. Unless you’re a professional in this area or are well read on relevant studies, I reiterate my previous comment that you’re just inventing the level of correlation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent