you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is easy to assume, isn’t it? It was not possible for you to look up the terms:

  • Pedophilia,
  • Hebephilia,
  • Ephebophilia, and
  • Nepiophilia,

right? It is so so hard to actually look up some things before you form and opinion, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, looking up terms does not give you insight into correlation or lack thereof. Who told you there’s no correlation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    That’s the very reason you classify and name it differently, because there is no obvious and clear correlation. If all people who are into 16 y/o would also be into 2 y/o, there would only be one term describing the condition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Different classifications can have strong correlation. Casual observation isn’t going to cut it here. Unless you’re a professional in this area or are well read on relevant studies, I reiterate my previous comment that you’re just inventing the level of correlation.

  • source
  • parent