you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

That’s the very reason you classify and name it differently, because there is no obvious and clear correlation. If all people who are into 16 y/o would also be into 2 y/o, there would only be one term describing the condition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Different classifications can have strong correlation. Casual observation isn’t going to cut it here. Unless you’re a professional in this area or are well read on relevant studies, I reiterate my previous comment that you’re just inventing the level of correlation.

  • source
  • parent