you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

That doesn't really make sense because they're still spending that money. A $1M/yr business expense on a new office that gives you a $1M/yr tax deduction isn't putting you ahead financially.

What you're missing from the "no deduction" side is that they're also not spending additional money on new offices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It makes more sense than having him commute via private jet like he used to

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wouldn't that be a business expense as well? I agree it's the more sane option, but they're both still insanely hypocritical options when compared to allowing remote work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it is. But if the CEO has a home office he doesn’t get a deduction.

    Honestly I’m amazed he didn’t buy the office and lease it back to the company. That sounds like the sort of sleaze I expect from the C-suite

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment