Collective Shout, a small but vocal lobby group, has long called for a mandatory internet filter that would prevent access to adult content for everyone in Australia. Its director, Melinda Tankard Reist, was recently appointed to the stakeholder advisory board for the government’s age assurance technology trial before the under-16s social media ban comes into effect in Australia in December.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 155 points 1 year ago (17 children)
  • [–] 71 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This group isn't interested in protecting children they're just interested in pushing their own beliefs on everybody else. The easiest way they can do that is to pretend that they're interested in children. Which I'm sure some of them are, but not in the capacity that anyone wants them to be.

    It's a classic right-wing tactic. Because nobody wants to be against a law that protects children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 22 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    “ All dem queer books are hurtin our kids, makin em all gay and shit! “

    Says the man standing in front of his trailer with a deep five o’clock shadow spanning his double chin, a permanently stained wife-beating tank top and a prominent beer gut, who has five scrawny & bruised kids, and a wife that bears an eerie resemblance to himself but can’t quite look anyone in the eye.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 94 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    The argument is control. Religious zealots are all about controlling society and subduing people to follow their rules (that they themselves tend to break all the time)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    They precisely can and they kinda just did. "Think of the children" is the magic phrase to shut down critical thinking and give you carte blanche to do whatever you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not always. School shootings happen and suddenly crickets on gun control. "Think of the children" only applies to moral outrage, not tangible physical threat prevention. Also applies to school lunches and any other actual tangible thing to ACTUALLY benefit general child welfare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    They want a nanny state to do their parenting for them, cus they are shit parents who spend their time petitioning the government about things they could just fucking unplug.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Bingo. They're just projecting their failures as inadequate parents because they didn't realize how hard child rearing would be after knocking up their high school sweetheart and buying a white picket fence. It's always the same case.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    And the reason sexual things had to be filtered was that they are harmful and skew kids' perception of healthy sexuality.

    Gambling wasn't considered healthy even where and when marrying a toddler was normal. After all, a traumatized person with unhealthy sexuality does generally understand they are traumatized, a person taught that addiction is normal - not.

  • source
  • parent