I mean... A. I said it was shitty math.

And B. I glanced at a number as I scrolled past, said "I'm not satisfied with a number that AI pulled out of nowhere," and checked the actual search results. There's a heavy emphasis on sustainability with hemp farming, so every source dealt with how much carbon it sequestered and "CO2 equivalent," which I guess includes other greenhouse gasses. I didn't feel like diving into how much of that was actually CO2, so I treated it all as CO2 for the sake of the (again, shitty) math.

If it makes you feel better, I'll close my eyes next time while I scroll past the AI crap on my way to the search results.