rule

the title was a reference to this meme:


(except it said 41kb, I can't find that version for some reason)

EDIT: shoutout to @AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world for making a version of the gif that's actually 41kb

EDIT 2: it wasn't loading for some people so I changed it back, womp womp :(

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 12 hours ago (1 child)

Neat. Thanks for the info.

Still a weak argument in context. they laid out the pitfalls with the thinking and this only attacks the inference of the association.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 hours ago

    Yeah, there's certainly ways the argument could be improved. I just get particularly irked when I see people throwing logical fallacies out like a rhetorical pokemon, especially when they're misusing them.

  • source
  • parent