Hi! I am working on a website akin to steamdb but for categorizing games on their AI use in the following

Categories:

  • Handcrafted: The game has been confirmed untouched by GenAI
  • Tainted: Gen AI has been used in any aspect of this game's creation. Any usage of the technology puts you in this category.
  • Slop: Use of Gen AI is outwardly visible by players
  • Fraud: Developer lied about AI involvement in their products.

How the system would work:

It'd be a comunity driven, honor based effort. Users would summit reports and a group of trusted moderators would validate them.

Why I'm making this post:

I am looking for possible questions, problems, challenges and ideas you guys might come up with. I have a "Questions and answers" section down bellow with what I'd cover up myself.

Questions and answers

What counts as GenAI?

Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, Claude, Deepseek, etc. Image generation models line Nano Banana, Stable diffusion, etc.

Why take such a harsh stance on GenAI?

AI use has been irrevocably tied to the problems it creates. It's being used as a tool to centralize power away from artists and creators towards a select few people with too much money on their hands.

Using AI is analogous to accepting all of the valid concerns against it and endorsing the problems it's wedged themselves in.

What counts as AI usage?

Any personal use by you or anyone you are in charge of on the project. It's the duty of the person in charge to ensure that your work stays human.

"I use local models I'd be allowed in handcrafted"

You're still furthering the use of a technology designed to steal and plagiarize. While local models address some of the enviromental problems of GenAI it's still an active endorsement of the theft done to train such models.

"I barely used GenAI for my game"

You made the choice to use GenAI on your game. You might have not been aware of the consequences of such choice but it's still a choice you made.

"My game has been tagged tainted even though I made it all"

This is a community effort, I'm sorry if you've been falsely targeted/tagged. There's always going to be bad actors. Contact the website at support@website.com and we'll do our best to rectify the error.

"Why shouldn't I just not disclose that I used GenAI"

No one's forcing you to disclose the use of such technology but it's something customers care about letting your customers make informed choices is how you build a reputation of quality and honesty.

"Why shouldn't I just lie about my GenAI use?"

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/fraud

Appart from that we have a special category reserved for this fraud. This is a website built around an honor system of reputation, do not tarnish it with abuse.

nerdspeakAnd with that the mess of ideas and html I've been messing with is out. My progress is slow but I'm making steps. The tech stack is based on the human-centric language zig, using a jsx-like framework named ziex, which I've been thoroughly enjoying. I plan on making the website fully open source but there's very little to showcase just yet. I'm just here to bounce ideas with the open web.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Second ps.: There might be a method of redemption for a project to move from tainted to handcrafted but it'd be easily verified. For example, Dave the diver has an LLM usage notice where they did the translations with AI. Should they re-do the translation work with actual translators (or let the community translate the work themselves) there might be a case towards bumping from tainted to hand-crafted.

I'll be honest, I feel fine tainted being the "standard" and handcrafted being a the selective seal of approval. I'll think things over. The chance for redemption creates subjective cases that give the people to say "why them but not me".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments