-1
humans are obligate carnivores (hackertalks.com)
submitted 1 day ago by to c/carnivore@discuss.online
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I know, I KNOW, we are omnivores (you, me, maybe not our llm friends, but most of us)... but that doesn't quite line up with biological necessity.

I would argue we are facultative omnivores, but obligate carnivores. We can eat plants for efficiency (famines and whatnot), but they are not necessary for life. Meat, however, is necessary - at the very least we would have b vitamin deficiencies without meat, and babies wouldn't develop into healthy humans without it.

People will argue, and i love you all for it, that maybe this applies historically but in the modern food environment we can engineer our way out of this obligation - sure, that's true, but when speaking of our species appropriate and native diet - we would still be obligate carnivores

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 6 hours ago

Cooking seems to be orthogonal to the discussion of species classification.

I agree with your point but it is moot for current day. To a degree, there is a case to be made about reviewing how we classify humans as a species. Human beings have long exceeded the biological limitations imposed by evolution.

People are feeding cats synthetic plant based diets now, but we still classify cats as obligate carnivores based on their natural diet in their natural environment.

That is surprising by a good number of reasons. Thankfully, we've learned how to synthesize taurine but regardless I can't fathom how the critters can absorb protein and other nutrients from plant matter.

Hurray for science, I say.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent